-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
76.
I jumped into the car and was immediately told that a strongly worded denial had been put out by
the Palace, squashing that morning’s bullying1 story. The denial was signed by none other than…
me. And Willy. My name attached by faceless others to words I’d never even seen—let alone
I went back to Frogmore. From there, remotely, over the next few days, I took part in the
drafting of a final statement, which went out January 18, 2020.
The Palace announced that The Duke and Duchess of Sussex had agreed to “step back,” that
we’d no longer “formally” represent the Queen, that our HRH titles would be in “abeyance”
during this transitional year — and that we’d offered to reimburse3 the Sovereign Grant for
refurbishments to Frogmore Cottage.
A firm “no comment” on the status of our security.
I flew back to Vancouver. Delicious reunion with Meg, Archie and the dogs. And yet, for a
few days, I didn’t feel fully4 back. Part of me was still in Britain. Still at Sandringham. I spent
hours glued to my phone, and the internet, monitoring the fallout. The ire directed at us by the
papers and the trolls was alarming.
“Make no mistake, it’s an insult,” cried the Daily Mail, which convened5 a “Fleet Street jury”
to consider our “crimes.” Among them was the Queen’s ex–press secretary, who concluded, with
his fellow jurors, that we should hereafter “expect no mercy.”
I shook my head. No mercy. The language of war?
Clearly this was more than simple anger. These men and women saw me as an existential
threat. If our leaving posed a threat to the monarchy6, as some were saying, then it posed a threat to
all those covering the monarchy for a living.
Hence, we had to be destroyed.
One of this lot, who’d written a book about me and thus provably depended on me to pay her
rent, went on live TV to explain confidently that Meg and I had departed from Britain without so
much as a by-your-leave to Granny. We’d discussed it with no one, she said, not even Pa. She
announced these falsehoods with such unfaltering certainty that even I was tempted7 to believe her,
and thus her version of events quickly became “the truth” in many circles. Harry8 blindsided the
Queen! That was the narrative9 that took hold. I could feel it oozing10 into history books, and I could
imagine boys and girls at Ludgrove, decades hence, having that hogwash rammed11 down their
throats.
I sat up late, brooding on it all, going over the progression of events and asking myself: What’s
the matter with these people? What makes them like this?
Is it all just about the money?
Isn’t it always? All my life I’ve heard people saying the monarchy was expensive,
anachronistic12, and Meg and I were now served up as proof. Our wedding was cited as Exhibit A. It
cost millions, and thereafter we’d up and left. Ingrates.
But the family paid for the actual wedding, and a huge portion of the remaining cost was for
security, much of which was made necessary by the press stirring up racism13 and class resentment14.
And the security experts themselves told us the snipers and sniffer dogs weren’t just for us: they
were to prevent a shooter from strafing the crowds on the Long Walk, or a suicide bomber15
blowing up the parade route.
Maybe money sits at the heart of every controversy16 about monarchy. Britain has long had
trouble making up its mind. Many support the Crown, but many also feel anxious about the cost.
That anxiety is increased by the fact that the cost is unknowable. Depends on who’s crunching17 the
numbers. Does the Crown cost taxpayers19? Yes. Does it also pay a fortune into government
coffers? Also yes. Does the Crown generate tourism income that benefits all? Of course. Does it
also rest upon lands obtained and secured when the system was unjust and wealth was generated
by exploited workers and thuggery, annexation20 and enslaved people?
Can anyone deny it?
According to the last study I saw, the monarchy costs the average taxpayer18 the price of a pint21
each year. In light of its many good works that seems a pretty sound investment. But no one wants
to hear a prince argue for the existence of a monarchy, any more than they want to hear a prince
argue against it. I leave cost-benefit analyses to others.
My emotions are complicated on this subject, naturally, but my bottom-line position isn’t. I’ll
forever support my Queen, my Commander in Chief, my Granny. Even after she’s gone. My
problem has never been with the monarchy, nor the concept of monarchy. It’s been with the press
and the sick relationship that’s evolved between it and the Palace. I love my Mother Country, and
I love my family, and I always will. I just wish, at the second-darkest moment of my life, they’d
both been there for me.
And I believe they’ll look back one day and wish they had too.
1 bullying | |
v.恐吓,威逼( bully的现在分词 );豪;跋扈 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 stunned | |
adj. 震惊的,惊讶的 动词stun的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 reimburse | |
v.补偿,付还 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 convened | |
召开( convene的过去式 ); 召集; (为正式会议而)聚集; 集合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 monarchy | |
n.君主,最高统治者;君主政体,君主国 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 tempted | |
v.怂恿(某人)干不正当的事;冒…的险(tempt的过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 harry | |
vt.掠夺,蹂躏,使苦恼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 narrative | |
n.叙述,故事;adj.叙事的,故事体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 oozing | |
v.(浓液等)慢慢地冒出,渗出( ooze的现在分词 );使(液体)缓缓流出;(浓液)渗出,慢慢流出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 rammed | |
v.夯实(土等)( ram的过去式和过去分词 );猛撞;猛压;反复灌输 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 anachronistic | |
adj.时代错误的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 racism | |
n.民族主义;种族歧视(意识) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 resentment | |
n.怨愤,忿恨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 bomber | |
n.轰炸机,投弹手,投掷炸弹者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 controversy | |
n.争论,辩论,争吵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 crunching | |
v.嘎吱嘎吱地咬嚼( crunch的现在分词 );嘎吱作响;(快速大量地)处理信息;数字捣弄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 taxpayer | |
n.纳税人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 taxpayers | |
纳税人,纳税的机构( taxpayer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 annexation | |
n.吞并,合并 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 pint | |
n.品脱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|