-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Ten years ago, I wrote a book which I entitled "Our Final Century?" Question mark. My publishers cut out the question mark. (Laughter) The American publishers changed our title to "Our Final Hour." Americans like instant gratification and the reverse. (Laughter)
And my theme was this: Our Earth has existed for 45 million centuries, but this one is special — it's the first where one species, ours, has the planet's future in its hands. Over nearly all of Earth's history, threats have come from nature — disease, earthquakes, asteroids2 and so forth3 — but from now on, the worst dangers come from us. And it's now not just the nuclear threat; in our interconnected world, network breakdowns4 can cascade5 globally; air travel can spread pandemics worldwide within days; and social media can spread panic and rumor6 literally7 at the speed of light. We fret8 too much about minor9 hazards — improbable air crashes, carcinogens in food, low radiation doses, and so forth — but we and our political masters are in denial about catastrophic scenarios11. The worst have thankfully not yet happened. Indeed, they probably won't. But if an event is potentially devastating12, it's worth paying a substantial premium13 to safeguard against it, even if it's unlikely, just as we take out fire insurance on our house.
And as science offers greater power and promise, the downside gets scarier too. We get ever more vulnerable. Within a few decades, millions will have the capability14 to misuse15 rapidly advancing biotech, just as they misuse cybertech today. Freeman Dyson, in a TED1 Talk, foresaw that children will design and create new organisms just as routinely as his generation played with chemistry sets. Well, this may be on the science fiction fringe, but were even part of his scenario10 to come about, our ecology and even our species would surely not survive long unscathed. For instance, there are some eco-extremists who think that it would be better for the planet, for Gaia, if there were far fewer humans. What happens when such people have mastered synthetic16 biology techniques that will be widespread by 2050? And by then, other science fiction nightmares may transition to reality: dumb robots going rogue17, or a network that develops a mind of its own threatens us all.
Well, can we guard against such risks by regulation? We must surely try, but these enterprises are so competitive, so globalized, and so driven by commercial pressure, that anything that can be done will be done somewhere, whatever the regulations say. It's like the drug laws — we try to regulate, but can't. And the global village will have its village idiots, and they'll have a global range.
So as I said in my book, we'll have a bumpy18 ride through this century. There may be setbacks to our society — indeed, a 50 percent chance of a severe setback19. But are there conceivable events that could be even worse, events that could snuff out all life? When a new particle accelerator came online, some people anxiously asked, could it destroy the Earth or, even worse, rip apart the fabric20 of space? Well luckily, reassurance21 could be offered. I and others pointed22 out that nature has done the same experiments zillions of times already, via cosmic ray collisions. But scientists should surely be precautionary about experiments that generate conditions without precedent23 in the natural world. Biologists should avoid release of potentially devastating genetically24 modified pathogens.
And by the way, our special aversion to the risk of truly existential disasters depends on a philosophical25 and ethical26 question, and it's this: Consider two scenarios. Scenario A wipes out 90 percent of humanity. Scenario B wipes out 100 percent. How much worse is B than A? Some would say 10 percent worse. The body count is 10 percent higher. But I claim that B is incomparably worse. As an astronomer27, I can't believe that humans are the end of the story. It is five billion years before the sun flares28 up, and the universe may go on forever, so post-human evolution, here on Earth and far beyond, could be as prolonged as the Darwinian process that's led to us, and even more wonderful. And indeed, future evolution will happen much faster, on a technological29 timescale, not a natural selection timescale.
So we surely, in view of those immense stakes, shouldn't accept even a one in a billion risk that human extinction30 would foreclose this immense potential. Some scenarios that have been envisaged31 may indeed be science fiction, but others may be disquietingly real. It's an important maxim32 that the unfamiliar33 is not the same as the improbable, and in fact, that's why we at Cambridge University are setting up a center to study how to mitigate34 these existential risks. It seems it's worthwhile just for a few people to think about these potential disasters. And we need all the help we can get from others, because we are stewards35 of a precious pale blue dot in a vast cosmos36, a planet with 50 million centuries ahead of it. And so let's not jeopardize37 that future.
And I'd like to finish with a quote from a great scientist called Peter Medawar. I quote, "The bells that toll38 for mankind are like the bells of Alpine39 cattle. They are attached to our own necks, and it must be our fault if they do not make a tuneful and melodious40 sound."
Thank you very much.
点击收听单词发音
1 ted | |
vt.翻晒,撒,撒开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 asteroids | |
n.小行星( asteroid的名词复数 );海盘车,海星 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 breakdowns | |
n.分解( breakdown的名词复数 );衰竭;(车辆或机器的)损坏;统计分析 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 cascade | |
n.小瀑布,喷流;层叠;vi.成瀑布落下 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 rumor | |
n.谣言,谣传,传说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 literally | |
adv.照字面意义,逐字地;确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 fret | |
v.(使)烦恼;(使)焦急;(使)腐蚀,(使)磨损 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 minor | |
adj.较小(少)的,较次要的;n.辅修学科;vi.辅修 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 scenario | |
n.剧本,脚本;概要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 scenarios | |
n.[意]情节;剧本;事态;脚本 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 devastating | |
adj.毁灭性的,令人震惊的,强有力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 premium | |
n.加付款;赠品;adj.高级的;售价高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 capability | |
n.能力;才能;(pl)可发展的能力或特性等 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 misuse | |
n.误用,滥用;vt.误用,滥用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 synthetic | |
adj.合成的,人工的;综合的;n.人工制品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 rogue | |
n.流氓;v.游手好闲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 bumpy | |
adj.颠簸不平的,崎岖的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 setback | |
n.退步,挫折,挫败 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 fabric | |
n.织物,织品,布;构造,结构,组织 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 reassurance | |
n.使放心,使消除疑虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 pointed | |
adj.尖的,直截了当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 precedent | |
n.先例,前例;惯例;adj.在前的,在先的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 genetically | |
adv.遗传上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 philosophical | |
adj.哲学家的,哲学上的,达观的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 ethical | |
adj.伦理的,道德的,合乎道德的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 astronomer | |
n.天文学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 flares | |
n.喇叭裤v.(使)闪耀( flare的第三人称单数 );(使)(船舷)外倾;(使)鼻孔张大;(使)(衣裙、酒杯等)呈喇叭形展开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 technological | |
adj.技术的;工艺的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 extinction | |
n.熄灭,消亡,消灭,灭绝,绝种 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 envisaged | |
想像,设想( envisage的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 maxim | |
n.格言,箴言 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 unfamiliar | |
adj.陌生的,不熟悉的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 mitigate | |
vt.(使)减轻,(使)缓和 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 stewards | |
(轮船、飞机等的)乘务员( steward的名词复数 ); (俱乐部、旅馆、工会等的)管理员; (大型活动的)组织者; (私人家中的)管家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 cosmos | |
n.宇宙;秩序,和谐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 jeopardize | |
vt.危及,损害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 toll | |
n.过路(桥)费;损失,伤亡人数;v.敲(钟) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 alpine | |
adj.高山的;n.高山植物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 melodious | |
adj.旋律美妙的,调子优美的,音乐性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|