美国有线新闻 CNN 2013-07-18（在线收听）

 Well, historian Kate Bllen joins me now. So expand, Kate thanks for joining us. Regardless if the child is a boy or a girl,he or she is the next in line for the throne. But explain to us for the first time in the history of the royals, what? What through interesting here , is that previously you have to be a boy to get that throne pretty much in the only girls  who get the  throne are those with no brothers. For example, Victoria Elizabeth II, Elizabeth I. Let’s remember that Henry the Eighth was so eager to have a son, he actually broke from the Church of Romeand set up his new church, so he can marry his mistress Anne Boleyn. In British history with privileged the king and now this is completely different this baby, if it is a girl, will be our next queen and it doesn't matter how many brothers she has. She will get the title, she will get the land, and she will be the richest woman in Europe, one of the richest women in the world. And this I think it's a big move forward that is to say, it's a big blow for female equality. We are saying women can do the top job and also suggest really the Monarchy has caught up with the rest Britain where, you know, supposed to be about equality here.