2006年VOA标准英语-Controversial Danish Cartoon Sparks Debate(在线收听) |
By Mil Arcega The violent outcry in the Muslim world over cartoon depictions of Islam's prophet is a reminder of the power - good and bad - of political cartoons.
"Obviously it has great power because it simplifies and focuses the person who looks at it to see an image; a reality that the cartoonist wants to portray." Political cartoons have used that power throughout history to provoke heated discourse, often by poking fun at serious issues. But some say the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten may have gone too far when it published cartoon depictions of the Prophet Muhammad. Matthew Felling is with the Center for Media and Public Affairs in Washington DC. He says this is more a theological argument rather than political. Media analyst Felling says publishing the caricatures once was insensitive, but he says doing it again, as several publications across Europe did, was a provocation. "It just seemed like they were jabbing a stick in the eye of Islamists in the Middle East. Should they be allowed to do so? Yes, they should, but just because you can, doesn't mean you should." Ayaan Hirsi Ali But poor judgment is one thing; to hurt, threaten and kill in retaliation is another. Professor Reich says the violent protests reveal a medieval mindset in some segments of the Muslim culture that is intolerant of other viewpoints. "This issue of tolerance is probably the most fundamental theme that emerges from this." And from some media analysts, the idea of thoughtful restraint. Mr. Felling adds, making insulting comments may go too far. "You don't have to offend people to get the point across is what I'm saying." Political cartoons -- whether they offend, inform or just make us laugh, their impact cannot be underestimated, as this controversy has demonstrated. |
原文地址:http://www.tingroom.com/voastandard/2006/2/30875.html |