Whoever wisn the next general eleciton, a lot of voter's going to be unhappy. There is a chance that the prime minster might come from a party that hasn't got a large share of the vote and might not even have the larggest number of seats in parliament. But how would you feel if you are a UK broad green voter. You may get a large propotion of votes, but only a handful of seats. These are big issues, and in the last parliamentary session, the people had their say on 2 major consititutional issues: first, on changing the voting system for the alternative vote and then on Scottish independence, and they were rejected both. 

 

 

Despite losing the referrendum, the Scottish national party contines to strive powerfully ahead and on our calls to become the third larggest party in Westminster. This could make their leader Nicola Sturgeon the Kingmaker, determing whether David Cameron remains as prime minister or has to step aside for Ed miniband. 

 

 

A pivotal role for a party that is only standing in one of the 4 nations of the United Kingdom and it is likely to get only around 4% of the total vote. 

 

If the nationally sentiment found here in Glasgow is merit across the rest of Scottland, then SMP could win up to 55 seats, who largely from Labour. 

 

 

So as to where to be a new Labour prime minister, he would almost certainly be dependent upon the support of the SMP. 

 

 

He would also be governing over a largely conservative boating in England. Rather Ironic, given the previous years of concertive rule over a Labour voting Scottland. This would inevitably put further strength on a cohesion of the union. Once again, raised the solid issue of whether it is fair for Scottish MPs to vote on matters of facing only England.

 

 

And ultimately, put the question of Scottish independence back on the agenda. 

 

 

You might imagine that the voters in Scottland and elsewhere have had their belly full of constitutional arguments. When offered the chance vote to change to the autonative vote system as where we are electing MPs to this house. They give a resounding no thanks. But the other side of the coin, is an undeniable sense public desatisfaction, a desire for change for something different, but what? If this general election doesn't produce a result, that satisfies the majority of voters. There is a danger that the existing disatisfaction might be compounded, developing into further anger and frustration and however that anger finds its expression, there is a danger that it will make the politician's job and neither the civil servant are whole lot harder.