2007年VOA标准英语-British Court Stops Deportation of Darfuri Asyl(在线收听) |
By Tendai Maphosa Court of Appeal judges in London have ruled in favor of three Darfuri asylum seekers the British government wanted to send back to Sudan. But as Tendai Maphosa reports from London for VOA, the judgment may be a temporary reprieve for the asylum seekers, as the government intends to petition the House of Lords for permission to appeal the court's decision. The judges ruled that the three should not be sent back to camps in Khartoum as conditions there were "unduly harsh." The three had appealed a ruling by the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal that would have sent them back to the Sudanese capital. The court ruling means that hundreds of Sudanese who fled violence in Darfur can now remain in Britain, at least until the government's petition is heard by the House of Lords. A statement by the Home Office Border and Immigration Agency expressed disappointment at the decision, saying the court had not found that the non-Arab Darfuris would face mistreatment in Khartoum. One of the three appellants, Naroudin Mohamed, who says he escaped from Darfur after being tortured, told VOA he has no doubt what would happen to him if he is sent back to Sudan. "Definitely, if they send you back it means the end of your life - maybe they will kill you. Thank God they did not send us back," Mohamed said. "This [is] important, first of all to protect the few hundred that have escaped the atrocities, and they are just a drop in the ocean, compared to the millions who are at risk out there. Now that they are on the shores of Britain we believe that we have an obligation to protect them," Smith said. |
原文地址:http://www.tingroom.com/voastandard/2007/4/37997.html |