The Central Intelligence Agency marks its 60th birthday this month.  The CIA has had a colorful and often controversial history.  In this background report, VOA correspondent Gary Thomas looks at the CIA's past and its current state.

CIA seal in the headquarters lobby

That led President Franklin Roosevelt to create the Office of Strategic Services to carry out espionage and sabotage in German and Japanese-occupied territories.

Sixty years after Pearl Harbor and billions of dollars spent on intelligence, the United States was the target of another surprise attack on September 11th, 2001.  The debate over the failure to intercept that attack continues.

With the end of the war the old OSS faded into history -- replaced by the CIA on September 18, 1947. 

The man known as "Wild Bill" -- OSS chief William Donovan -- lobbied vigorously for a post war intelligence agency to ensure that America's leaders would not make policy in ignorance. "America cannot afford to resume its prewar indifference," he said, "and here's a fact we must face: today there is not a single permanent agency to take over in peace time certain of the functions which OSS has performed in war time."

Peter Earnest

Oleg Kalugin, once a major general in the Soviet intelligence service, says the KGB [Soviet-era intelligence service] did not take the CIA lightly. "In terms of professional respect, the KGB viewed the CIA as, well, equal counterparts.  In fact, this is part of Russian intelligence and counterintelligence cultures: never underestimate your adversaries."

But the CIA has often come under fire for intelligence lapses such as the failure to foresee the collapse of the Soviet Union and the mistaken assertion that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.

Most controversial were the CIA's covert actions, such the 1953 coup in Iran that installed the Shah, or the overthrow of the Salvador Allende government in Chile in 1973 -- both by presidential order.

In his new history of the CIA, journalist Tim Weiner is sharply critical of the CIA's 60-year record. "The legacy of operational failures is long, very long, and the successes don't always stand."

John McLaughlin

McLaughlin sees success in the CIA's quick response in Afghanistan after the September 11th, 2001 terrorist attacks and the breakup of the A.Q. Khan nuclear proliferation network.

Still, many CIA veterans concede that the U.S. officials came to favor spy technology in place of the spies themselves -- or what professionals call "HUMINT," human intelligence. 

Eugene Poteat

Former deputy CIA chief John McLaughlin says in the wake of the September 11th terrorist attacks, it is especially important to get a proper balance when collecting intelligence. "Right now, the pendulum is over to the side of the spectrum that says HUMINT, that is, classic espionage -- human spies -- are the keys to success.  But we have to be careful not to do that to the exclusion of technology.  Where we make a mistake is when we put all of our eggs in one of these baskets."

Almost half of the CIA's current workforce was hired after September 11th, 2001.  This new computer-literate generation of analysts and field officers are now on watch -- snooping with technology the old Cold War spies never envisioned.