VOA常速英语2019--特朗普和民主党之间的传票之争不断升级(在线收听

Battle Over Subpoenas Escalates Between Trump, Democrats

Hush money payments allegedly made to adult film star Stormy Daniels, the security clearance for president Trump’s son-in-law and special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe on Russian meddling in the 2016 election, these are some of the controversies being investigated by congressional Democrats.On Sunday, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler threatened to subpoena Attorney General William Barr if he refuses to testify this Thursday about the Mueller report.The administration says it disagrees with the format of the questioning.It’s the House wanting to have staff and others interview, turning generally are really outrageous the way they’re behaving...Democrats have already subpoenaed several officials including former White House Counsel Don McGahn who threatened to resign rather than carry out Trump’s 2017 order to fire Mueller.Trump says he will fight all subpoenas.

据称,特朗普向成人影星Stormy Daniels支付了封口费,特朗普总统女婿安全许可被降级,特别检察官罗伯特·穆勒对俄罗斯干涉2016年大选的调查,这些都是国会民主党正在调查的一些争议。周日,众议院司法委员会主席Jerry Nadler威胁司法部长William Barr,如果他周四拒绝就穆勒的报告作证,就要传唤他。政府表示不同意质询的方式。众议院希望采访工作人员和其他人,他们的行为方式实际上是非常离谱的……民主党人已经传唤了好几位官员,其中包括前白宫顾问Don McGahn,他曾经威胁要辞职,也不听从特朗普2017年的指令解雇穆勒。特朗普表示他不会听从任何的传唤。

I have been the most transparent president and administration in the history of our country by far.Although there is debate on whether some testimony should be made public,most constitutional scholars agree the president has no legal basis to refuse to respond to Congress.In fact that in and of itself is an independent reason potentially to impeach a president because then he wouldn’t be following the Take Care Clause of the Constitution under which the executive has to take care that laws are faithfully executed.Polls show most Americans oppose impeachment.After the release of the Mueller report, Trump has threatened to take Democrats to the Supreme Court if they impeach him.The move is questioned legally but the rhetoric may be effective politically.

我是美国建国以来最透明的总统,我的政府也是史上最透明的行政机构。虽然就是否公开某些证词一事上人们还存在争议,但大多数宪法学者都认为总统没有法律依据拒绝回应国会。事实上,这本身就是一个可能会弹劾总统的一个理由,因为这是没有遵守宪法的保护条款,而行政部门必须忠实地履行法律条目。民意调查显示,大多数美国人反对弹劾。在穆勒报告发布后,特朗普威胁说如果他们弹劾他,就会把把民主党人告到最高法院。此举合法性遭到质疑,但此言论可能在政治上行之有效。

Most of us don’t read those kinds of documents every day and don’t understand the kinds of arguments and frankly evidence standards that are in them, so to repeat a conclusion that’s as simple as no collusion over and over again has been effective.Meanwhile, Trump’s personal attorneys have sued House Oversight Committee Chair Elijah E. Cummings,a Democrat for issuing a subpoena seeking Trump’s personal financial records.The administration is also denying requests from Democrats to hand over Trump’s tax returns and is refusing to comply with subpoenas in the investigation of the controversial decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census.

我们大多数人每天都不会阅读这些类型的文件,也不了解其中的论点,坦白地说,也不了解其中的证据标准,所以一遍又一遍地重复一个简单的结论,即不存在勾结,是有效的。与此同时,特朗普的私人律师起诉了众议院监督委员会主席Elijah E. Cummings,他是一名民主党人,曾向特朗普发出传票,要求其提供个人财务记录。美国政府还否认民主党交出特朗普的纳税申报表的要求,并且拒绝遵守调查有关2020年人口普查中增加公民身份问题争议性决定的传票。

  原文地址:http://www.tingroom.com/voastandard/2019/5/474313.html