-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
This is AS IT IS! I’m Caty Weaver1.
On the show today … We talk about the debate in the United States about targeted killings2 of American terrorism suspects overseas. The Obama administration is defending its policy after the release of a document that supports such attacks.
We also explore relations, past, present and future, between the United States and Russia. VOA’s Andre de Nesnera spoke3 about the issue with some former American officials. He answers some questions for us.
Three former United States officials recently discussed relations between America and Russia with VOA reporter André de Nesnera. Kelly Jean Kelly has Andre’s report from Washington.
During President Obama’s first administration, efforts to change America’s relations with Russia produced important results. There was a major arms control treaty to reduce the number of long-range nuclear weapons.
In another example of cooperation, Russia voted at the United Nations for stronger restrictions4 on Iran over its suspected nuclear weapons program. That policy had long been supported by the United States and other western nations, but resisted by Russia.
William Cohen served as defense5 secretary for President Clinton. He says the international community must continue to pressure the Iranians to give up their nuclear weapons plans.
“Otherwise we are going to continue to see the kind of instability in the region and questions about whether or not there will be any kind of military action in the future.”
Experts say another sign of improved relations includes military cooperation. Russia decided6 to let American forces move through the country as they travel in and out of Afghanistan and also provided availability to a Russian military base.
Former United States National Security Adviser7 Brent Scowcroft served in the administration of two presidents. He says Russia and the United States are no longer enemies, as they were during the Cold War.
“If you look around the world, we don’t have areas of inevitable8 confrontation9 and conflict either with the Russians or with the Chinese. And we have to try to take advantage of that.”
Russia and the United States remain divided on several issues, including the crisis in Syria. The Obama Administration has called for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to resign. But Russia has objected to a change in leadership.
Another disagreement concerns the Obama Administration’s plan to deploy10 a missile defense in Europe. And Russian President Vladimir Putin has been accused of repressing civil society. Critics say the Obama Administration has not condemned11 this strongly enough. One of those critics is John Bolton, former United States ambassador to the United Nations in the administration of George W. Bush.
“It’s a measure of Putin’s confidence that he can basically act without fear of retaliation12 from the United States. That has helped embolden13 him to crack down: crack down on political dissents14, crack down in the economic sphere, really trying to establish authority - not in a communist sort of way, but in the traditional fashion of a very, very strong central government.”
It will be interesting to see if during his second term in office, President Obama spends as much time on relations with Russia as he did during his first term. I’m Kelly Jean Kelly.
Andre de Nesnera agreed to join us in the studio to answer some more questions.
“Hello, Andre.”
“Hi Caty.”
“So you talked to John Bolton and he said the Obama administration isn’t doing enough to affect President Putin’s crackdown on civil liberties, free expression, political dissent15. And I was wondering if you could comment on what the Obama administration is doing. What steps it is taking.”
“Now one has to remember that John Bolton is from the other side the political spectrum16 being a Republican former Ambassador to the United Nations. He has a stake, if you will, in criticizing the Obama administration.”
“But having said that, I’ve been following the Soviet17 Union and Russia for many, many years now, and when I compare the way the US is handling the whole issue of human rights, now and then, there is a difference. The big difference is that when the Soviet Union was part of the global world, at every step of the way, whether there were negotiations18 between the United States and the Soviet Union on other issues, human rights always came up. The United States always brought up human rights.”
“And it seems that now that Russia is a democratic, or moving towards a democratic government, there is less of that. Remember, we are having a new secretary of state, John Kerry, who just took over a few days ago and he has stated that human rights will be an important part of going forward in US and Russian relations. The Russians will always say you are interfering19 in internal affairs, but the United States, I think, will be a stronger advocate for human rights.”
“So John Kerry may change the approach?”
“May change the approach or may suggest to the president to change the approach.”
“Well, thank you very much.”
“ My pleasure.”
You are listening to AS IT IS.
The Obama administration is defending its policy of targeted attacks on Americans overseas suspected of terrorist involvement. The defense comes after the release of a Justice Department memo20. As we hear from Steve Ember, the document justifies21 the attacks as part of America’s war on terrorism.
Attorney General Eric Holder22 defended the policy in a meeting with reporters earlier this week.
“(Our) primary concern is to keep the American people safe, but to do so in a way that is consistent with our laws and consistent with our values.”
But the appearance of the document has raised concerns about the policy in Congress. Among those concerned about the administration’s justification23 is Congressman24 Jim Moran, a member of the president’s party.
“I think we have come right up to the edge of a serious threat to Americans’ civil liberties. What troubles me is that there is no judicial25 review.”
Legal experts say the Justice Department memo suggests a wider definition of an imminent26 terrorist threat. Jeffrey Rosen teaches law at George Washington University.
“One of the most troubling aspects of the Obama administration’s legal analysis is its vast expansion of the idea of what kind of imminent threat can justify27 a targeted assassination28.”
Concerns about targeted killings grew after a drone strike in Yemen in September 2011. That attack killed two Americans whom officials said were involved in terrorist activities.
Presidential spokesman Jay Carney says the use of drone aircraft to target American terrorism suspects is legal, ethical29 and wise. He notes that Congress has approved of the war against al-Qaida. He says it is being carried out in a way consistent with the Constitution.
I’m Steve Ember.
And that’s AS IT IS for today.
I’m Caty Weaver.
Tell us what you want to hear about on our new show. We want to cover the issues and ideas that matter to you, in your world, as it is.
1 weaver | |
n.织布工;编织者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 killings | |
谋杀( killing的名词复数 ); 突然发大财,暴发 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 restrictions | |
约束( restriction的名词复数 ); 管制; 制约因素; 带限制性的条件(或规则) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 adviser | |
n.劝告者,顾问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 inevitable | |
adj.不可避免的,必然发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 confrontation | |
n.对抗,对峙,冲突 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 deploy | |
v.(军)散开成战斗队形,布置,展开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 condemned | |
adj. 被责难的, 被宣告有罪的 动词condemn的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 retaliation | |
n.报复,反击 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 embolden | |
v.给…壮胆,鼓励 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 dissents | |
意见的分歧( dissent的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 dissent | |
n./v.不同意,持异议 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 spectrum | |
n.谱,光谱,频谱;范围,幅度,系列 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 Soviet | |
adj.苏联的,苏维埃的;n.苏维埃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 negotiations | |
协商( negotiation的名词复数 ); 谈判; 完成(难事); 通过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 interfering | |
adj. 妨碍的 动词interfere的现在分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 memo | |
n.照会,备忘录;便笺;通知书;规章 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 justifies | |
证明…有理( justify的第三人称单数 ); 为…辩护; 对…作出解释; 为…辩解(或辩护) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 holder | |
n.持有者,占有者;(台,架等)支持物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 justification | |
n.正当的理由;辩解的理由 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 Congressman | |
n.(美)国会议员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 judicial | |
adj.司法的,法庭的,审判的,明断的,公正的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 imminent | |
adj.即将发生的,临近的,逼近的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 justify | |
vt.证明…正当(或有理),为…辩护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 assassination | |
n.暗杀;暗杀事件 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 ethical | |
adj.伦理的,道德的,合乎道德的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|