-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
By David Gollust
State Department
05 April 2006
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice went to Congress Wednesday to defend the Bush administration's nuclear accord with India, which she said is a "strategic achievement" that would strengthen nuclear non-proliferation efforts. She ran into skeptical1 questioning from Democrats3 who said lenient4 U.S. treatment of India might encourage would-be nuclear weapons states.
---------------------------------------------------
Condoleezza Rice testifies on Capitol Hill
The secretary's testimony5 before key congressional committees began a new, more intensive phase of the administration's effort to win approval for the India nuclear deal, which would allow India access to U.S. civilian6 nuclear technology in return for a pledge to open its non-military nuclear facilities to international inspections7.
The agreement, concluded a month ago during President Bush's visit to India, has drawn8 a mixed reaction in Congress, split largely down partisan9 lines.
Many Republicans welcome the accord as advancing a growing partnership10 with India.
Democrats are concerned that it may suggest a U.S. double standard, accepting India's status as a nuclear weapons power despite its refusal to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, at the same time the administration is trying to curb11 the nuclear programs of Iran and North Korea.
Opening a day-long set of hearings with an appearance before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Secretary Rice said the agreement, requiring congressional amendment12 of a 50-year-old non-proliferation law, is a strategic achievement that will cement the U.S. relationship with India, a rising global power.
She said it would strengthen the international non-proliferation regime by putting 65 percent of India's nuclear plants under international inspections, a share that will grow over the years as new power plants come on line.
She rejected suggestions it would fuel a nuclear arms race in South Asia, saying that is solely13 a function of the regional political and military situation. And she dismissed any parallel between India's nuclear program and those of Iran and North Korea.
"Iran and especially North Korea are of course closed, non-democratic societies," said Rice. "India is a democracy. In fact, India is increasingly doing its part to support the international community's efforts to curb the dangerous nuclear ambitions of Iran. In sum, the U.S.-India civil nuclear cooperation initiative is a strategic achievement. It's good for America. It's good for India, and it's good for the international community."
The ranking Democrat2 on the Foreign Relations Committee, Delaware Senator Joseph Biden, said he was inclined to support the agreement. But he also said the Bush administration is making a gamble that future Indian governments will live up to the terms of the agreement, and if they do not he suggested that the entire global framework for containing nuclear weapons development will be at risk.
"I respectfully suggest that if this goes through, and we are wrong about their intentions, they will have mortgaged the 21st century literally14 in a way that few nations will be held accountable for having done," said Biden. "They will have squandered15, and I don't anticipate this, but they will have squandered what I think to be an opportunity to build a new century. I mean I literally think it is that fundamental."
Republican George Allen of Virginia, however, called the agreement a good bet on a partnership with the world's largest democracy. He said it could help stabilize16 troubled world energy markets by giving India advanced nuclear power capacity at the same time helping17 improve the environment, given India's current dependence18 on high-sulfur coal.
But there was other criticism. Maryland Democrat Paul Sarbanes said the terms of the legislation would require Congress to cede19 excessive authority to the executive branch in monitoring Indian compliance20.
California's Barbara Boxer21, a leading critic of administration foreign policy, joined House Democratic colleague Tom Lantos in raising concern about Indian military cooperation with Iran, including port calls in India this month by Iranian warships22.
Secretary Rice said Indian authorities had given assurances their country was not training Iranian military personnel and that their military contacts were low level. She also said India's recent vote in the International Atomic Energy Agency was a key in getting the issue of Iran's nuclear program referred to the U.N. Security Council.
1 skeptical | |
adj.怀疑的,多疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 democrat | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士;民主党党员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 lenient | |
adj.宽大的,仁慈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 civilian | |
adj.平民的,民用的,民众的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 inspections | |
n.检查( inspection的名词复数 );检验;视察;检阅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 partnership | |
n.合作关系,伙伴关系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 curb | |
n.场外证券市场,场外交易;vt.制止,抑制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 amendment | |
n.改正,修正,改善,修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 solely | |
adv.仅仅,唯一地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 literally | |
adv.照字面意义,逐字地;确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 squandered | |
v.(指钱,财产等)浪费,乱花( squander的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 stabilize | |
vt.(使)稳定,使稳固,使稳定平衡;vi.稳定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 helping | |
n.食物的一份&adj.帮助人的,辅助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 dependence | |
n.依靠,依赖;信任,信赖;隶属 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 cede | |
v.割让,放弃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 compliance | |
n.顺从;服从;附和;屈从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 boxer | |
n.制箱者,拳击手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 warships | |
军舰,战舰( warship的名词复数 ); 舰只 | |
参考例句: |
|
|