-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
By Peter Fedynsky
Washington, DC
14 April 2006
watch Darfur report
The Darfur region of Sudan is in the midst of genocide. Diplomats2 have so far failed to stop the tragedy, citing that country's complex mix of colonial history, tribal3 warfare4, corruption5, bureaucracy, and foreign interests. VOA's Peter Fedynsky reports that some Americans currently and previously6 involved in Darfur are calling on the United States to make a better effort at finding a solution.
----------------------------------------------------
Darfur, baby under tent
Nearly 200,000 people have been killed and another two million have been left homeless Darfur. And the situation appears to be getting worse. UN officials say it is becoming more difficult to deliver food and to maintain security in Darfur, where only about 7,000 African Union troops are trying to keep peace in a territory about as large as France.
In a public discussion at the Brookings Institution think tank in Washington, DC, former Pentagon spokesman Ken7 Bacon said Americans should ask whether the U.S. Darfur policy is working.
"Our policy has been conflicted and I think very unclear toward the regime, because we have cooperated with them in one respect on intelligence and anti-terrorism, while trying to condemn8 them for being genocidists on the other side.
Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick says the United States has contributing about $1.3 billion per year to Sudan, but not for the Darfur security operation. The State Department official says that's because the U.S. government is set up to fund only United Nations peacekeeping operations.
"And since your budgets are developed years in advance, when we had to put together basically eleven, $12 million a month for this operation, we had no money. So frankly9, I and my colleagues have been raiding various accounts in the State Department and reallocating things to try to do this."
Zoellick says the State Department tried and failed late last year to get $50 million from Congress specifically for Darfur, though he says lawmakers may yet approve a supplemental appropriation10 this year of $173 million.
The director of foreign policy studies at Brookings, former diplomat1 Carlos Pascual, noted11 the difficulty of getting concerted United Nations action in Darfur because individual nations use their Security Council veto powers to protect vested interests.
"There are some countries such as China that have very specific financial interests in Sudan. There is Russia that has a concern about how it votes on any of these questions because of the precedent12 that it creates for scrutiny13 of internal conflicts."
Pascual said individual Americans should maintain pressure on Congress to allocate14 the funds needed to help the people of Darfur.
1 diplomat | |
n.外交官,外交家;能交际的人,圆滑的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 diplomats | |
n.外交官( diplomat的名词复数 );有手腕的人,善于交际的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 tribal | |
adj.部族的,种族的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 warfare | |
n.战争(状态);斗争;冲突 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 corruption | |
n.腐败,堕落,贪污 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 previously | |
adv.以前,先前(地) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 ken | |
n.视野,知识领域 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 condemn | |
vt.谴责,指责;宣判(罪犯),判刑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 frankly | |
adv.坦白地,直率地;坦率地说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 appropriation | |
n.拨款,批准支出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 precedent | |
n.先例,前例;惯例;adj.在前的,在先的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 scrutiny | |
n.详细检查,仔细观察 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 allocate | |
vt.分配,分派;把…拨给;把…划归 | |
参考例句: |
|
|