-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
By Lisa McAdams
Kiev, Ukraine
20 April 2006
VOA Correspondent Lisa McAdams at the prohibiton zone near the Chernobyl nuclear power plant
A recent United Nations report about the world's worst nuclear accident at Chernobyl 20 years ago says the consequences of the disaster were overblown and that scientists now believe the radioactive nuclear fallout was not as harmful to human health as previously1 reported. But for those living in what was long believed to be one of the worst affected2 countries, Ukraine, the message does not ring true.
------------------------------------------
Chernobyl is like a tale of two cities. For some, it is a poisoned place of death and fear, forgotten and abandoned. For others, it is a phoenix3 rising, a city struggling to come back to life, after surviving the unthinkable, the explosion of a nuclear reactor4 and the release of nearly nine tons of radioactive material.
After 20 years have passed, debate still rages over basic questions such as, how many people died as a result of the explosion? And, how should the nations affected by nuclear fallout provide for their population's health and safety, as well as their energy needs. During this month, the 20th anniversary of the explosion, there are still many views of the legacy5 of Chernobyl.
Hundreds of leading experts recently concluded, in a report released ahead of the anniversary, that fewer than 50 deaths could be directly attributed to radiation from the disaster, almost all of them exposed rescue workers, or so-called liquidators. However, the U.N. report went on to say that radiation from the explosion could still cause up to 4,000 deaths in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus - not tens of thousands, as was once widely thought.
These latest figures provide a much less dire6 assessment7 of the long-term consequences of the Chernobyl disaster than ever before.
Ivan Zharavich
But former liquidator Ivan Zharavich, who now serves as the local administrator8 of a Ukrainian region that includes Chernobyl, says the report is just not true. He says the exact number of victims from Chernobyl may never be known. But, he says, the toll9 is nothing short of devastating10, especially for those who were children at the time of the blast.
Zharavich says, before the accident, the region had a child illness rate of two percent. Now, he says, it is 88 percent. And, he adds, nearly every day, there is a funeral, with more than half the people dying, not from natural causes, but from what he and others believe to be radiation-induced illnesses.
More alarming, he says, is that long-term monitoring and studies of Chernobyl's effect on children have essentially11 stopped, though many believe that the offspring of this next generation and beyond could provide more clues. As one scientist put it, there are undoubtedly12 more unpleasant surprises on the way.
Doctor Igor Komisarenko
Doctor Igor Komisarenko who heads Kiev's Institute for Endocrinology and Metabolism13, is a bit more optimistic. His clinic is the lead organization in Ukraine offering treatment for nuclear radiation cancer, especially in children. To date, he has performed more than 500 surgeries on Chernobyl children, many of whom, he says, have gone on to live healthy, productive lives.
The doctor says the number of surgeries he performs on children with nuclear thyroid cancer is now very low, approaching the level of what was experienced before the explosion at Chernobyl.
But he acknowledges that could be due, in part, to the fact that the children who got radiation at the time of the accident have now grown up. And these days, he says, he sees more adults coming in with the same kind of radiation cancer.
Scientists and engineers still work at the now-closed Chernobyl plant, monitoring the de-commissioning of the three reactors14 that were operational after the explosion, and more importantly, some say monitoring the second sarcophagus, or shell, that is being prepared to protectively surround the damaged reactor by 2012.
The $800 million project is considered vital, as there are leaks and cracks in the current shell that many experts fear could collapse15, creating a second catastrophe16 at Chernobyl.
Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko is reportedly considering using the polluted territory as a burial ground for spent nuclear waste from other countries.
Leading nuclear energy analyst17 Vladimir Osatenko, a former liquidator who, also served eight years in Ukraine's parliament, says he disapproves18 of the plan. In his view, nuclear waste is even more dangerous than power plants like Chernobyl.
Osatenko says nuclear waste "remains19 poisonous thousands of years, far longer than any politician." And yet, he says, our leaders create this huge waste by agreeing to build more and more plants. He likens the process to a Pandora's Box, which, once open, he says, is nearly impossible to close.
According to Osatenko, Ukraine has 130 million cubic meters of nuclear waste that, to this day, is unmanaged. He says the time of studies and research is long over. As he put it, "somebody needs to pick up a shovel20 and figure out where to put it."
Meanwhile, villagers have begun toiling21 in Ukraine's pollution-ridden soil, planting potatoes, tomatoes and other food to feed their families.
Analyst Osatenko says the risk is still too great and much stronger controls are needed.
He says it takes two hours to conduct one radioactive sample on a single food source. That is why, he says, it is simply not possible for everything to be tested. He says that if sellers checked to the degree necessary, they would never have time to serve any customers. As a result, he says, he has no faith in the safety of the food supply from affected regions.
As Osatenko sees it, the lessons of Chernobyl have still not been learned. Perhaps in time, he says, history will record that humanity prevailed. But he says, in his view, in the case of Chernobyl, nobody wins.
Still, seemingly against all odds22, there are small signs of renewal23.
Hundreds of people have moved back to the zone to try and re-start their lives. They do so in what is now listed as one of Europe's largest wildlife habitats, thanks largely to the lack of human intrusion. But that too could change, as Chernobyl itself has become somewhat of an emerging tourist destination for so-called extreme tourists, who come to visit the disaster site, one of the most feared places on the planet.
收听单词发音 |
1
previously
|
|
| adv.以前，先前（地） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
affected
|
|
| adj.不自然的，假装的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
phoenix
|
|
| n.凤凰，长生(不死)鸟；引申为重生 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
reactor
|
|
| n.反应器；反应堆 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
legacy
|
|
| n.遗产，遗赠；先人(或过去)留下的东西 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
dire
|
|
| adj.可怕的，悲惨的，阴惨的，极端的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
assessment
|
|
| n.评价；评估；对财产的估价，被估定的金额 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
administrator
|
|
| n.经营管理者，行政官员 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
toll
|
|
| n.过路(桥)费；损失，伤亡人数；v.敲(钟) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
devastating
|
|
| adj.毁灭性的，令人震惊的，强有力的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
essentially
|
|
| adv.本质上，实质上，基本上 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
12
undoubtedly
|
|
| adv.确实地，无疑地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
13
metabolism
|
|
| n.新陈代谢 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
14
reactors
|
|
| 起反应的人( reactor的名词复数 )； 反应装置； 原子炉； 核反应堆 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
15
collapse
|
|
| vi.累倒；昏倒；倒塌；塌陷 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
16
catastrophe
|
|
| n.大灾难，大祸 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
17
analyst
|
|
| n.分析家，化验员；心理分析学家 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
18
disapproves
|
|
| v.不赞成( disapprove的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
19
remains
|
|
| n.剩余物，残留物；遗体，遗迹 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
20
shovel
|
|
| n.铁锨，铲子，一铲之量；v.铲，铲出 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
21
toiling
|
|
| 长时间或辛苦地工作( toil的现在分词 )； 艰难缓慢地移动，跋涉 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
22
odds
|
|
| n.让步，机率，可能性，比率；胜败优劣之别 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
23
renewal
|
|
| adj.(契约)延期，续订，更新，复活，重来 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
购买
在百度中搜索