-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
By Deborah Tate
Capitol Hill
22 March 2007
A U.S. Senate committee has followed the lead of its counterpart in the House of Representatives and authorized3 subpoenas5 to compel White House aides to testify in public and under oath about the dismissals of federal prosecutors6. VOA's Deborah Tate reports from Capitol Hill.
The Democratic-led Senate Judiciary Committee agreed by voice vote to authorize2 subpoenas for President Bush's adviser8 Karl Rove, former White House lawyer Harriet Miers, and two deputy White House officials to compel sworn and public testimony9 about the dismissals of eight U.S. attorneys.
Patrick Leahy (l) and Senator Edward Kennedy take part in a debate on whether to issue subpoenas to White House staffers in the dismissal of U.S. attorneys, 22 Mar1 2007
Senator Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat7, is chairman of the committee.
LEAHY: "All those in favor say "aye".
SENATORS: "Aye"
LEAHY: "Opposed?"
SENATORS: "No"
LEAHY: "I would say the "ayes" have it, the "ayes" do have it. The subpoenas are authorized."
One Republican, Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, asked that the committee record show that he voted with the majority to authorize the subpoenas.
Like the House Judiciary Committee action a day earlier, the Senate panel did not actually issue the subpoenas, to allow for the possibility that a deal could be reached with the White House to head off a constitutional confrontation10.
But there is no indication the White House is ready to compromise, with President Bush stating that his aides would be made available only for private interviews with a limited number of lawmakers and not under oath.
Chairman Leahy rejected the president's offer, despite pleas from the top Republican on the committee, Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, to try to seek a compromise with the White House before considering subpoenas.
Senate Judiciary Committee members, Senator Arlen Specter (l) and Committee Chairman Senator Patrick Leahy, 22 Mar 2007
In an exchange with Leahy, Specter argued that moving toward confrontation with the White House would only tie up the matter in courts for years.
SPECTER: "Question number one is, will this investigation11 be best served by finding out what we can now as opposed to litigation which will take more than two years, and question number two, related to question number one: if we do not like what we get, we can always issue a subpoena4 and move with the subpoena if we do not like what we get? Why not take what we can get?"
LEAHY: "No. We are told what we can get is nothing, nothing, nothing! We are told we can have a closed-door meeting with no transcript12, not under oath, a limited number of people, and the White House will determine what the agenda is. That to me is nothing."
Senator Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat, argued that the White House cannot dictate13 how Congress operates.
"The two branches of government are equal," she said. "If we do not use the power that we are given to get at facts that are important, we do not deserve to hold these positions. I do not believe we can get at those facts in a closed room, without a record, simply interviewing a selected number of witnesses."
But Senator Jon Kyl, an Arizona Republican, said it is the Congress that is seeking to meddle14 in the affairs of the White House.
"We are dealing15 with an equal branch of government, and we are intruding16 into deliberations among the top advisers17 to that head of that branch of government," he said.
Kyl echoed President Bush's opposition18 to compelling White House officials to testify in public and under oath, saying it would have a "chilling effect" on the ability of future presidents to get candid19 advice from aides who may fear they will be forced to publicly testify about their private conversations.
Democratic critics say the attorney firings were politically motivated, and have called for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' resignation over his handling of the matter.
President Bush has voiced his support for Gonzales.
Gonzales reiterated20 that no attorney was dismissed for improper21 reasons, and said he remains22 committed to working with lawmakers in their investigation of the issue.
1 mar | |
vt.破坏,毁坏,弄糟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 authorize | |
v.授权,委任;批准,认可 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 authorized | |
a.委任的,许可的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 subpoena | |
n.(法律)传票;v.传讯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 subpoenas | |
n.(传唤出庭的)传票( subpoena的名词复数 )v.(用传票)传唤(某人)( subpoena的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 prosecutors | |
检举人( prosecutor的名词复数 ); 告发人; 起诉人; 公诉人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 democrat | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士;民主党党员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 adviser | |
n.劝告者,顾问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 confrontation | |
n.对抗,对峙,冲突 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 dictate | |
v.口授;(使)听写;指令,指示,命令 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 meddle | |
v.干预,干涉,插手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 dealing | |
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 intruding | |
v.侵入,侵扰,打扰( intrude的现在分词);把…强加于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 advisers | |
顾问,劝告者( adviser的名词复数 ); (指导大学新生学科问题等的)指导教授 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 candid | |
adj.公正的,正直的;坦率的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 reiterated | |
反复地说,重申( reiterate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 improper | |
adj.不适当的,不合适的,不正确的,不合礼仪的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|