-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Des Moines
10 January 2008
The first events of the U.S. presidential election season, the Iowa caucuses1 and the New Hampshire primary, drew coverage2 from all the major news media, but many people followed the events on internet sites featuring ordinary citizens as journalists and commentators3. VOA's Greg Flakus caught up with some of the practitioners4 of this so-called "new media" in Des Moines and filed this report.
At this year's Iowa caucuses there were about 2,500 accredited5 news media representatives, most of whom work for major newspapers, magazines and television networks. But there were also many citizen journalists working for non-traditional outlets6, including small publications, internet blogs and video web sites.
At the Des Moines Convention Center, Google Incorporated, operated a lounge for reporters featuring video streams from its YouTube web site projected on the walls. YouTube is encouraging average citizens to document the campaign and provide their own insights using small, affordable7 camcorders and computers.
Google Political Director Steve Grove8 says YouTube is a platform for ordinary citizens with their cameras to explore issues and express their ideas.
"The great thing about YouTube is that anyone can upload anything they want, with their viewpoint on the issues and you do not have that traditional filter of the media deciding what is right and what is wrong," he said. "It is the voters decision to say, 'Hey, here is what I think and here is the video that demonstrates that point of view and it is your choice whether to look at it or not.' "
One of the most prolific9 groups putting videos up on YouTube is called "Why Tuesday?"
WhyTuesday? Executive Director Jacob Soboroff argues that the U.S. political system in some ways discourages people from voting, noting that elections are traditionally held on Tuesday because that was convenient for farmers in the nation's early years. But he says it makes little sense in today's urban society.
"What we are saying is 'Let us take a good, hard, honest look at the state of the voting system, have an open and honest conversation about it.' We are not giving answers, we are just asking provocative10 questions about it," Soboroff said. "We think that by having an open conversation we can get to some good, non-partisan11 solutions to help increase voter participation12 in the United States."
Soboroff says Why Tuesday? also benefits from video submissions13 by ordinary citizens who record encounters with politicians at all levels.
"People are becoming journalists themselves and putting their elected officials on the spot about something that in the mainstream14 media you do not hear much about and that is what can we do to increase voter participation," he said.
Keeping a wary15 eye on all this is Drake University Political Science Professor Arthur Sanders, who sees promise in the technology.
"The web technology, the way it has evolved makes it easier for individuals or groups of people to have information sites and not just for politics, but for anything you can imagine," he said. "People with an interest in politics decide to report on politics. It is an empowering shift for citizens because they have a lot more control over it."
But Sanders also sees danger ahead as traditional mass media outlets lose readers and viewers to the often less reliable and fragmented new media sites.
"There is a risk, there is a danger that we become tribalized [fragmented into partisan interest groups]," he said. "The internet as a technology, this kind of diversified16 technology, runs the risk of dividing us up much more fully17."
Sanders is also concerned that these grassroots blogs and video uploads tend to attract people who are intensely interested in only one or two issues and fail to provide a broad forum18 where all issues can be discussed.
"Newspaper readership and traditional television news viewing is down, some of these other forms are up, but they do not seem to be up enough to compensate19 for how much the other forms are down," he said. "One of the impacts of this technology is smaller numbers of people actually paying attention to politics. Now, those who do pay attention have more resources than they ever had before."
Sanders and other academic researchers who follow developments in politics and journalism20 will be studying further the impact of these new grassroots media as this election year unfolds.
1 caucuses | |
n.(政党决定政策或推举竞选人的)核心成员( caucus的名词复数 );决策干部;决策委员会;秘密会议 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 coverage | |
n.报导,保险范围,保险额,范围,覆盖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 commentators | |
n.评论员( commentator的名词复数 );时事评论员;注释者;实况广播员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 practitioners | |
n.习艺者,实习者( practitioner的名词复数 );从业者(尤指医师) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 accredited | |
adj.可接受的;可信任的;公认的;质量合格的v.相信( accredit的过去式和过去分词 );委托;委任;把…归结于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 outlets | |
n.出口( outlet的名词复数 );经销店;插座;廉价经销店 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 affordable | |
adj.支付得起的,不太昂贵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 grove | |
n.林子,小树林,园林 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 prolific | |
adj.丰富的,大量的;多产的,富有创造力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 provocative | |
adj.挑衅的,煽动的,刺激的,挑逗的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 participation | |
n.参与,参加,分享 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 submissions | |
n.提交( submission的名词复数 );屈从;归顺;向法官或陪审团提出的意见或论据 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 mainstream | |
n.(思想或行为的)主流;adj.主流的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 wary | |
adj.谨慎的,机警的,小心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 diversified | |
adj.多样化的,多种经营的v.使多样化,多样化( diversify的过去式和过去分词 );进入新的商业领域 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 forum | |
n.论坛,讨论会 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 compensate | |
vt.补偿,赔偿;酬报 vi.弥补;补偿;抵消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 journalism | |
n.新闻工作,报业 | |
参考例句: |
|
|