-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
A key former defense1 official has testified under subpoena2 about the Bush administration's authorization3 of harsh interrogation techniques. VOA's Dan Robinson reports from Capitol Hill, Douglas Feith denied he favored harsh interrogation of prisoners in the war against terror.
Douglas Feith (file photo)
Feith was Undersecretary of Defense for Policy from 2001 to 2005, serving under former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
He is one of a group of former Bush administration officials involved in high-level discussions about U.S. interrogation policies after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States, as well as policy leading up to the war in Iraq.
Opening the hearing - the fourth so far dealing4 with interrogation at the Guantanamo Bay detention5 facility - panel chairman Jerrold Nadler said administration interrogation tactics have brought shame to the United States.
"It seems clear from the evidence that we have been able to assemble so far, that the administration decided6 early on to engage in torture, to use any rationale to do what generations of soldiers understood we could not do, and to conceal7 that face from the American people and the world," he said. "As a result our nation and especially our men and women in uniform are less safe today."
Republicans reflected the Bush administration's position that so-called enhanced interrogation techniques, including simulated drowning or water-boarding, provided important intelligence and were used only on three key al-Qaida suspects.
Some, including Representative Trent Franks, also asserted that majority Democrats8' focus on interrogation policies has been detrimental9 to U.S. security.
"This is about the 10th hearing that we have in this subcommittee that was dedicated10 primarily to making sure that we were protecting the rights of terrorists, and I understand that," he said. "But we have none that I know of that are dedicated to protecting the lives of American citizens and I think 10 to zero is a little out of balance."
Deborah Perlstein is, a legal scholar with Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School for Public and International Affairs, describes lawmaker's investigations11 as extremely important.
"The U.S. record of detainee treatment has fallen far short of what our laws require, and what our security interests demand," she said.
Under questioning, Feith described himself as a strong champion of respect for the Geneva Conventions, denying that he ever recommended setting aside Common Article 3 relating to detainee treatment.
He says he and former Joint12 Chiefs of Staff Chairman Richard Myers argued to the contrary to former Defense Secretary Rumsfeld.
"That Geneva is crucial for our own armed forces," said Faith. "I described Geneva as a good treaty that requires its partners to treat prisoners of war the way we want our captured military personnel treated. I noted13 that U.S. troops are trained to uphold Geneva and this training is an essential element of U.S. military culture."
"I wrote that Geneva is morally important, crucial to U.S. morale14 and it's also practically important because it makes U.S. forces the gold standard in the world facilitating our winning cooperation from other countries," he added.
Feith had scathing15 criticism for British lawyer, Philippe Sands, who alleged16 in a book called Torture Team that Feith was a primary voice arguing against adherence17 to Common Article 3.
Calling Sands' book "a weave of inaccuracies and distortions," Feith describes it as part of an inaccurate18 narrative19 by Bush administration critics.
"That flawed book is a pillar of the argument that Bush administration officials despised the Geneva Conventions and encouraged abuse and torture of detainees," he said. "Congress and the American people should know that this so-called torture narrative is built on sloppy20 research, misquotations and unsubstantiated allegations."
Sitting at the witness table with Feith, Sands denied having misrepresented or misquoted Feith, whom he had interviewed.
"At the heart of these hearings lie issues of fact," said Sands. "If Congress cannot sort this out, and if the desire for foreign investigations is to be avoided, the need to investigate the facts fully21 in this house and the other house is an important one, and foreign investigations may become impossible to resist if that does not happen."
Sands quoted from a recorded interview with Feith, in which the former official said al-Qaida members were not entitled to have the Geneva Conventions applied22 at all. This appears unambiguous, says Sands, to include Common Article 3 of the conventions.
In June, lawmakers questioned David Addington, chief of staff to Vice23 President Dick Cheney, and former Justice Department official John Yoo about their roles in memoranda24 establishing legal justifications25 for harsh interrogation techniques.
Despite Republican criticisms, Democrats have scheduled a fifth hearing of the House subcommittee focusing on interrogation policies for this Thursday.
1 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 subpoena | |
n.(法律)传票;v.传讯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 authorization | |
n.授权,委任状 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 dealing | |
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 detention | |
n.滞留,停留;拘留,扣留;(教育)留下 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 conceal | |
v.隐藏,隐瞒,隐蔽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 detrimental | |
adj.损害的,造成伤害的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 dedicated | |
adj.一心一意的;献身的;热诚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 investigations | |
(正式的)调查( investigation的名词复数 ); 侦查; 科学研究; 学术研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 joint | |
adj.联合的,共同的;n.关节,接合处;v.连接,贴合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 morale | |
n.道德准则,士气,斗志 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 scathing | |
adj.(言词、文章)严厉的,尖刻的;不留情的adv.严厉地,尖刻地v.伤害,损害(尤指使之枯萎)( scathe的现在分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 alleged | |
a.被指控的,嫌疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 adherence | |
n.信奉,依附,坚持,固着 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 inaccurate | |
adj.错误的,不正确的,不准确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 narrative | |
n.叙述,故事;adj.叙事的,故事体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 sloppy | |
adj.邋遢的,不整洁的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 applied | |
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 vice | |
n.坏事;恶习;[pl.]台钳,老虎钳;adj.副的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 memoranda | |
n. 备忘录, 便条 名词memorandum的复数形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 justifications | |
正当的理由,辩解的理由( justification的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|