-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
When the 111th Congress ends within the next few weeks, many international initiatives will be left behind. Among them are several UN conventions thought to have the support of the administration, including the Elimination1 of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, the Rights of the Child, and the Law of the Sea.
Analyst2 Brett Schaefer of the Washington-based Heritage Foundation doubts they'll be taken up by the new more conservative Congress.
In the 100-member U.S. Senate, 67 votes are required to ratify3 a treaty. But that number has been hard to reach - even with a large Democratic Party majority during the first two years of the Obama administration.
White House
The President meets with national security experts on the New START treaty, White House Photo, Chuck Kennedy, 11/18/10
Schaefer says it will be even harder when six new Republican legislators take their seats early next year in the Senate.
"The prospect4 for the US Senate to give its advice and consent necessary for ratification5 of those treaties was rather high under the previous make up of the US Senate which had 60 Democrats6 and a number of moderate Republicans," says Schaefer. "But some of the moderate Republicans have been replaced and the number of Republicans in the Senate has increased, reducing the prospects7 for any kind of treaty ratification over the next two years."
New START
The best known of the proposed accords is the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) with Russia.
The administration would like to have it ratified8 by the current Senate. According to the New York Times, if the vote were taken today, the president would need the help of at least 9 Republicans. If he waits for the new Congress to meet early next year, he will need at least 14).
Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC), a strong supporter of the Tea Party movement, which aims to reduce the size and expense of government, opposes the new treaty. In mid-November, 10 new Republican Senators publically announced their desire to participate in the debate. Among them are Marco Rubio (of Florida), Ron Johnson (of Wisconsin), former US trade Representative Rob Portman (of Ohio), and Rand Paul (of Kentucky).
Among the Republican supporters of the New START treaty is the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee, Richard Lugar.
CLIMATE CHANGE
One treaty likely to receive little or no support is the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, which is currently holding its annual meeting in Cancun, Mexico.
President Obama favors reducing US greenhouse gas emissions9 by approximately 17 percent below 2005 levels.
World Bank
Parched10 soil by the White Nile in Sudan. Some scientists say drought brought on by climate change contributes to such cases of land degradation11
But an effort to introduce a so-called cap-and-trade deal to limit emissions failed to gain support in the US Senate last year. And, the Washington Post says nearly half of the incoming Republican legislators to the House have doubts about that climate change is caused by human activity.
Energy analyst Nick Loris of the conservative Heritage Foundation says that view is reflected in the desire by some new legislators for a new direction for the House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming.
"They want to get to the root of the science behind global warming," says Loris, "and create more of an objective platform to allow different climatologists with dissenting12 views to bring their expertise13 to the table and create and honest and transparent14 debate, rather than one that says the science is settled, which is what happened in the past with the committee in the past."
Loris says many conservatives are also concerned that multilateral efforts could restrict US decision-making, and economic growth.
"There is concern," he says, "that with regard to [the Kyoto Agreement and other] climate change treaties, the US Government would not be making decisions any more with regard to these policies. [They] would be [decided] by the UN Framework.
"There was a large concern if we enter into one of the treaties where the US is one of 192 countries (involved), there [would be] a lot of sovereignty lost to big economic decisions that could significantly regulate the (US) private sector15."
Conservatives say free-market incentives17 can help stem deforestation, which contributes between 20 to 25 percent of the carbon emissions that cause climate change.
Some say President Obama may have to settle for smaller initiatives like helping18 poor countries adapt to climate change or paying for measures to reduce deforestation. They say the president and Congress might agree on subsidies19 for reducing the pollutants20 in coal, and for improving the development of nuclear energy and others forms of energy supported by conservatives.
However, Loris says Republicans are against using tax payer money to subsidize any technologies used to combat climate change. He says fostering free trade between nations is a better way to get needed technology to the developing world, rather than government-to-government financial support which is likely be wasted. He says even deforestation has a free-market solution.
"If you privatize some of these areas," says Loris, "the businesses or private owners of the forests have the incentive16 to keep them grown and sustainable and the incentive when they are cut down to re-grow those areas. It is matter of establishing private property rights in countries where [they are not well established]."
Despite differences over multilateral treaties and conventions, observers say there may yet be common ground between the administration and the new Congress.
Dan Ikenson, the associate director of trade policy studies at the Washington-based CATO Institute, say the new Congress and the administration could compromise on trade deals with Colombia, Panama and South Korea.
According to Bloomberg News, a deal with Seoul would create $68 billion in trade, and would boost Obama's goal of creating US jobs and doubling US exports over the next five years.
Ikenson says the prospects for trade are much better now with the Republican Congress.
Observers say the Obama administration and the new Congress are both likely to favor bilateral23 deals to boost trade, and jobs.
"Another agreement in the works with Obama is the Trans Pacific Partnership24, which was originally between Brunei, New Zealand, Chile and Singapore. It now includes the United States, Vietnam, Peru and Malaysia.
"The reason the administration likes it is it does not have to defend a Bush era trade agreement, and it gives them time to work with congress to figure out what they want. That's the next great hope in terms of trade agreements."
Among Senate Republicans said to favor the pact21 are Jim DeMint (of South Carolina), former US trade representative Rob Portman (of Ohio), and Mark Kirk (of Illinois).
DEVELOPMENT
The House may also be inclined to support new trade agreements, according to Sarah Jane Staats, the director of policy outreach at the Center for Global Development in Washington, DC.
"Dave Camp (R-Michigan) is likely to be the head of the House Ways and Means Committee and Kevin Brady (R-Texas) the (likely) chair of the Trade Subcommittee (of the Ways and Means Committee), says Staats. "They've been extremely good on the role of the US in the world and the importance of trade to the domestic economy and to global development. So I am hopeful there."
Development experts are concerned budget cuts could affect administration initiatives to curb25 global hunger and promote good health
Staats also sees continued cooperation on foreign policy issues including two administration priorities: the Global Health Initiative for fighting malaria26, HIV and neglected diseases, and the 3.5 billion dollar initiative to boost the production of small farmers and agricultural industries in the developing world, Feed the Future.
"In the past, there has been enormous bipartisan support for global health," says Staats, "and we saw huge increases in combating AIDS under Bush...Feed the Future is newer and has not received the attention it needed in past years, but again builds on some sentiments shared across the aisles27 [of Congress]."
Analysts28 say there will likely be budget cuts in some foreign assistance and humanitarian29 programs. However, Staats is hopeful budget pressures will also force much-needed reforms to the government's strategy for overseas development. That could mean the better use of trade and other policy tools to support development, and changes in how, and where, the US focuses its efforts.
1 elimination | |
n.排除,消除,消灭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 analyst | |
n.分析家,化验员;心理分析学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 ratify | |
v.批准,认可,追认 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 prospect | |
n.前景,前途;景色,视野 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 ratification | |
n.批准,认可 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 prospects | |
n.希望,前途(恒为复数) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 ratified | |
v.批准,签认(合约等)( ratify的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 emissions | |
排放物( emission的名词复数 ); 散发物(尤指气体) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 parched | |
adj.焦干的;极渴的;v.(使)焦干 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 degradation | |
n.降级;低落;退化;陵削;降解;衰变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 dissenting | |
adj.不同意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 expertise | |
n.专门知识(或技能等),专长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 transparent | |
adj.明显的,无疑的;透明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 sector | |
n.部门,部分;防御地段,防区;扇形 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 incentive | |
n.刺激;动力;鼓励;诱因;动机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 incentives | |
激励某人做某事的事物( incentive的名词复数 ); 刺激; 诱因; 动机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 helping | |
n.食物的一份&adj.帮助人的,辅助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 subsidies | |
n.补贴,津贴,补助金( subsidy的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 pollutants | |
污染物质(尤指工业废物)( pollutant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 pact | |
n.合同,条约,公约,协定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 pacts | |
条约( pact的名词复数 ); 协定; 公约 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 bilateral | |
adj.双方的,两边的,两侧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 partnership | |
n.合作关系,伙伴关系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 curb | |
n.场外证券市场,场外交易;vt.制止,抑制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 malaria | |
n.疟疾 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 aisles | |
n. (席位间的)通道, 侧廊 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 analysts | |
分析家,化验员( analyst的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 humanitarian | |
n.人道主义者,博爱者,基督凡人论者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|