-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Labour's Prime Minister Gordon Brown, right, Conservative Party leader David Cameron, left, and Liberal Democrat1 Party leader Nick Clegg, take part in Britain's third televised election debate in Birmingham, England, Thursday, April 29, 2010. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown is seeking political redemption in his country's third and final live televised debate after an open microphone caught him dismissing a retired2 Labour voter as a "bigoted3 woman." (AP Photo / Jeff Overs, BBC Pool)
On May 6 British voters go to the polls to elect a new government. With thousands of troops fighting in Afghanistan, the election is being held against a backdrop of rising British casualties, plus the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran also remains4 on the agenda. Until recently the election result seemed fairly certain but as Henry Ridgwell reports from London, the rise of a newcomer could have big implications for the future of Britain's foreign policy.
Three men are battling to become Britain's next prime minister.
The winner will govern a country at war.
Britain has some 10,000 troops in Afghanistan. Losses are approaching 300.
Despite wavering public support, all three main parties appear determined5 to push ahead with the mission. Conscious that a faraway and costly6 war doesn't play well with voters, incumbent7 Gordon Brown insists the troops are fighting to keep Britain safe "We have got to be clear that we cannot allow terrorists to have territory in the world that then they use as a base to attack the United Kingdom," he said.
But opinion polls point to a change of leader after May 6. And that's likely to prompt the new government to reconsider the Afghan strategy.
"I think that there will be a refocusing of how the UK can operate within Pakistan and Afghanistan, but also there will be some serious questions about whether or not the UK can maintain this expeditionary role, potentially punching above its weight," said Alex Neill, head of the Asia program at the Royal United Services Institute.
TV debates, a first in British politics, have thrust the outsider Nick Clegg of the Liberal Democrats8 into the role of kingmaker in a close election. He favors an all or nothing approach to Afghanistan, either more resources, or a complete pullout.
If Afghanistan represents the immediate9 issue, Iran is the long term challenge. In recent years Britain has turned up the rhetoric10, putting Iran alongside the likes of North Korea as a potential nuclear enemy.
Clegg's Liberal Democrats want to phase out Britain's own nuclear weapons, but his rivals, including Prime Minister Gordon Brown, say this would send the wrong message to Tehran. "Get real about the danger we face if we have North Korea, Iran and other countries with nuclear weapons and we give up our own," Mr. Brown said.
"This is extraordinary, to say 'get real.' What is dangerous is to commit to spend a whole lot of money that we might not have on a system that most certainly won't help when the world is changing, when we're facing new threats, where now more and more military experts are saying there are different alternatives," said Clegg. "You want to hold a review and you want to exclude the one big issue which should be right at the heart of that review."
"I thought I'd never utter these words but I agree with Gordon. You cannot put off this decision." said Conservative Party candidate David Cameron.
Agreement could be key for the next parliament. A close result would force the parties to share power. So, would a coalition11 government - with the dovish Liberal Democrats as kingmakers - change British policy on Iran?
"In terms of foreign policy where Iran comes in, all three parties are following the same interventionist policies which gave us the Iraq war, the wars in Afghanistan and elsewhere in the world and I think on that even the Liberal Democrats - despite being perceived as softer - they're following the same underlying12 policies. On the other hand they are kind of worried of course that in the face of opponents such as the Conservatives they do not want to be seen as weak," said Mohammed Kamaali, who heads the Campaign against Military Action and Sanctions against Iran.
Britain has traditionally prided itself on punching above its weight on the international scene. But its economy is weighed down by record public debt.
And whatever his ideology13 or beliefs - Britain's next leader may find that it's the economy that is the ultimate driver of policy at home and abroad.
1 democrat | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士;民主党党员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 retired | |
adj.隐退的,退休的,退役的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 bigoted | |
adj.固执己见的,心胸狭窄的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 costly | |
adj.昂贵的,价值高的,豪华的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 incumbent | |
adj.成为责任的,有义务的;现任的,在职的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 rhetoric | |
n.修辞学,浮夸之言语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 coalition | |
n.结合体,同盟,结合,联合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 underlying | |
adj.在下面的,含蓄的,潜在的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 ideology | |
n.意识形态,(政治或社会的)思想意识 | |
参考例句: |
|
|