-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
An elderly victim holds a poster and waits for the verdict in the premises1 of Bhopal court in Bhopal, India, 07 Jun 2010
The Indian government is looking at the need for tougher laws to deal with industrial disasters, amid outrage2 in India about punishment meted3 out for the 1984 deadly gas leak in Bhopal from a Union Carbide-owned chemical plant. Thousands of people were killed after inhaling4 the poisonous gas, while tens of thousands were left coping with serious health ailments5.
In the days since a local court handed out two-year prison terms to seven former Indian employees of Union Carbide, many searching questions have been raised about the verdict.
Angry survivors6, activists8 and the media are asking why it took nearly 26 years to get the first convictions in the disaster.
Rachna Dhingra represents the Bhopal Group for Information and Action, which has been working to rehabilitate9 and get justice for the victims of the gas leak. She blames the government and a slow moving judiciary for the long wait.
"It has gone from one court to another and there has been no will actually to strengthen the case… there has been lack of political will," said Dhingra.
Campaigners have slammed the verdict, calling the two-year prison term for the former top managers "too light." However, lawyers point out that this was the maximum sentence the local court could have handed out for the offense10 for which the men were tried.
The managers of Union Carbide, who have been granted bail11, were originally charged with culpable12 homicide, which could have resulted in a harsher sentence. But, in 1996, the supreme13 court reduced the charges to criminal negligence14, citing existing laws.
Facing a barrage15 of criticism for failing to get adequate justice for the tens of thousands of victims of the Bhopal gas leak, the government has said it needs to revisit laws pertaining16 to the kind of industrial disaster witnessed in Bhopal.
A spokesperson for the ruling Congress Party, Jayanti Natarajan, says a group of nine senior ministers will examine the issue.
"An empowered group of ministers has been set up to study whether any changes in the law are necessary. We are all outraged17 that the punishment is something that is equal to a traffic accident. We are all aware of that," said Natarajan.
Law Minister Veerappa Moily says India does not have a law to deal with a mass disaster. He has spoken of the need for fast-track courts for such cases and a specific law for such mishaps19.
What exactly caused the gas leak is still unclear. Union Carbide blamed it on sabotage20 by a disgruntled employee. The prosecution21 argued that it was caused by a design defect in the plant and negligent22 operational practices. Critics have charged that the company got away with just paying $470 million in compensation.
The government has responded by saying the case against the American head of Union Carbide at the time of the leak is still open. Warren Anderson faces manslaughter charges in India, but the United States has rejected efforts to extradite him.
Acknowledging the huge anger among the victims and survivors of the disaster, the chief minister of Madhya Pradesh state, where Bhopal is located, Shivraj Singh Chouhan, promises to appeal the verdict.
He says the state government will go to a higher court to get a tougher sentence and secure justice for the victims.
Survivors of the tragedy and activists fear that such an appeal is again likely to get entangled23 in India's slow moving judicial24 system. However, they are not giving up their quest for justice.
Satinath Sarangi, a prominent activist7 working with the victims of the gas leak, says the fight could be led by the generation born in the aftermath of the disaster.
"As the young people in Bhopal, the children of survivors have said, that now they will take it along and they will fight till complete justice is done," said Sarangi.
Activists and many politicians say it is important for India to strengthen laws and systems to handle any future mishap18, because many foreign corporations are establishing plants and factories in the country to benefit from its booming economy.
They are also urging the government to look closely at proposed legislation which would cap the liabilities of foreign companies planning to establish civil nuclear plants in India to $110 million.
Critics and opposition25 parties say the government must draw lessons from the Bhopal disaster and modify the controversial Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill to ensure that India will be able to hold private companies responsible for any mishap. The government says there is no connection between the two issues.
1 premises | |
n.建筑物,房屋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 outrage | |
n.暴行,侮辱,愤怒;vt.凌辱,激怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 meted | |
v.(对某人)施以,给予(处罚等)( mete的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 inhaling | |
v.吸入( inhale的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 ailments | |
疾病(尤指慢性病),不适( ailment的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 survivors | |
幸存者,残存者,生还者( survivor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 activist | |
n.活动分子,积极分子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 activists | |
n.(政治活动的)积极分子,活动家( activist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 rehabilitate | |
vt.改造(罪犯),修复;vi.复兴,(罪犯)经受改造 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 offense | |
n.犯规,违法行为;冒犯,得罪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 bail | |
v.舀(水),保释;n.保证金,保释,保释人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 culpable | |
adj.有罪的,该受谴责的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 negligence | |
n.疏忽,玩忽,粗心大意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 barrage | |
n.火力网,弹幕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 pertaining | |
与…有关系的,附属…的,为…固有的(to) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 outraged | |
a.震惊的,义愤填膺的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 mishap | |
n.不幸的事,不幸;灾祸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 mishaps | |
n.轻微的事故,小的意外( mishap的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 sabotage | |
n.怠工,破坏活动,破坏;v.从事破坏活动,妨害,破坏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 prosecution | |
n.起诉,告发,检举,执行,经营 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 negligent | |
adj.疏忽的;玩忽的;粗心大意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 entangled | |
adj.卷入的;陷入的;被缠住的;缠在一起的v.使某人(某物/自己)缠绕,纠缠于(某物中),使某人(自己)陷入(困难或复杂的环境中)( entangle的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 judicial | |
adj.司法的,法庭的,审判的,明断的,公正的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|