-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Lexington
How to win 99.6% of the vote
Too many members of Congress are running unopposed
DAYS before he seeks re-election to Congress for an eighth time, Representative Mike Capuano of Massachusetts has yet to order a single bumper1 sticker or “I Like Mike” lawn sign. That is not as risky2 as it might sound. In his district, a Democratic bastion that covers the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, chunks3 of Harvard University and swathes of blue-collar Boston, Mr Capuano faces no Republican opponent—or opposition4 of any kind. His is the only name that will appear on the ballot5 on November 4th.
This is no novelty for Mr Capuano. After he first won the seat in 1998, he never faced a Republican opponent again, often cruising to victory with such Cuban-style scores as 99.6% of the vote. Pondering past races, he struggles to recall details of the few independents who have challenged him. “I had a Communist, right?” he asks an aide. “A Socialist6? Six years ago? Four?”
Few others in Congress have been as safe for as long. But Mr Capuano has more company than before. Ever-fewer races for the House of Representatives are closely fought, leaving four-fifths of that body's 435 members with little to fear on polling day. Their doomed7 challengers—formerly stirred to action by a mix of idealism, ambition, vanity and (at times) self-delusion—seem at last to be noticing the odds8 against them. Add on the soaring costs of any election, and a growing number are quitting the field.
In 2014 Republicans have put up no challenger in 37 House races, while Democrats9 are ceding10 32 districts without a fight, according to David Wasserman of the Cook Political Report. A further eight House districts will see no contest between the main parties, thanks to a “top two” primary system used in Washington state and California, in which ordinary voters (rather than just party members) can pick the two candidates who compete for each seat in the general election—a move sold as a cure-all for partisan11 extremism, but which can turn safe districts into blue-on-blue and red-on-red fights. That total of 77 single-party House races is high by recent standards and marks a big jump since 2012, when there were 45 of them. Stephen Colbert, a comedian12, once persuaded aFlorida congressman13 running unopposed to tell the camera that he liked cocaine14 and prostitutes, by arguing that it didn't matter what he said because he couldn't possibly lose.
One-party districts cannot be good for democracy. In Massachusetts this year Republicans are running in only three of nine House races and are contesting half the seats in the state legislature. Mr Capuano, a plain-speaking former mayor, says that having a Republican opponent would have “virtually no impact” on him. In such a safe seat, danger comes from his own side. His elections are fought months before polling day, he explains. Any Democratic challengers have a narrow window to show themselves by making exploratory calls, collecting signatures, turning up to public events, and generally testing whether the congressman is vulnerable. Mr Capuano aims to be “very conscientious” about constituency service at all times, but between January and April in election years, “I step on the gas.” All signs of possible weakness are watched for. Whenever he runs unopposed in his Democratic primary he counts the blank votes cast, precinct by precinct, knowing that rivals are doing the same.
In today's Democratic Party, challengers seldom invoke15 ideology16, Mr Capuano notes, contrasting his lot with that of Republican incumbents18 who must fear organised attacks from the right. In politics, Republicans are like dogs, working as a pack, he suggests: “Democrats are the cats.” The congressman, 62, has something of the tom-cat about him: it is possible to imagine him ruling a maze19 of alleys20, with many scars and a torn ear. Asked about fund-raising (he has 628,000 cash on hand, according to his most recent electoral filing), he growls21: “I do my share.” Almost all will be given to other Democrats, he explains, though he will keep enough money “to dissuade22 potential opponents”.
An old alley-cat might call Curt23 Myers an idealistic pup. A 21-year old Republican college student from Brookline, just outside Mr Capuano's fief, he has chosen to mount a hopeless bid for the Massachusetts state House, running in his home district of 15th Norfolk, a hotbed of liberalism which last saw a Republican candidate before he was born. He is realistic about his chances, but wants to give his home town “the debate it deserves”. He has beaten his fund-raising target of 25,000—enough to build a website and buy some yard signs. He is heartened that the Democratic incumbent17 has agreed to a public debate and that even “far-left” folk say they are glad that he is running—though they will not vote for him. Less hearteningly, he has been spat24 on three times for being a Republican. Alas25 for fans of democratic accountability, Mr Myers does not think he would run for Congress against similarly bleak26 odds.
Showing up is 80% of life
In part, this is a story about the professionalisation of politics. Even unwinnable House races are now monitored by cold-eyed number-crunchers. Both parties fear zealous27 amateurs who may pollute their national brand. They also fret28 about the effect that one race may have on another. For example, in Massachusetts Republicans have a good chance of winning the governorship so long as turnout is not too high (because conservatives are more likely to vote). So a strong Republican challenge in a close House race might be counter-productive, spurring Democrats to pour in resources, raising turnout and kneecapping the chances of the Republican in the more important race.
Why stop at 77 seats with no inter-party contest, then? “It's going to get worse before it gets better,” predicts a Republican bigwig. Such political vacuums surely cannot last indefinitely: voters would not tolerate a House with hundreds of uncontested seats, touch wood. Until then, the creaking of a two-party system in distress29 will grow louder.
1 bumper | |
n.(汽车上的)保险杠;adj.特大的,丰盛的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 risky | |
adj.有风险的,冒险的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 chunks | |
厚厚的一块( chunk的名词复数 ); (某物)相当大的数量或部分 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 ballot | |
n.(不记名)投票,投票总数,投票权;vi.投票 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 socialist | |
n.社会主义者;adj.社会主义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 doomed | |
命定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 odds | |
n.让步,机率,可能性,比率;胜败优劣之别 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 ceding | |
v.让给,割让,放弃( cede的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 comedian | |
n.喜剧演员;滑稽演员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 Congressman | |
n.(美)国会议员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 cocaine | |
n.可卡因,古柯碱(用作局部麻醉剂) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 invoke | |
v.求助于(神、法律);恳求,乞求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 ideology | |
n.意识形态,(政治或社会的)思想意识 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 incumbent | |
adj.成为责任的,有义务的;现任的,在职的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 incumbents | |
教区牧师( incumbent的名词复数 ); 教会中的任职者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 maze | |
n.迷宫,八阵图,混乱,迷惑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 alleys | |
胡同,小巷( alley的名词复数 ); 小径 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 growls | |
v.(动物)发狺狺声, (雷)作隆隆声( growl的第三人称单数 );低声咆哮着说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 dissuade | |
v.劝阻,阻止 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 curt | |
adj.简短的,草率的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 spat | |
n.口角,掌击;v.发出呼噜呼噜声 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 alas | |
int.唉(表示悲伤、忧愁、恐惧等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 bleak | |
adj.(天气)阴冷的;凄凉的;暗淡的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 zealous | |
adj.狂热的,热心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 fret | |
v.(使)烦恼;(使)焦急;(使)腐蚀,(使)磨损 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 distress | |
n.苦恼,痛苦,不舒适;不幸;vt.使悲痛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|