-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Today is the deadline for the Environmental Protection Agency to announce a new rule designed to clean up the haze1 that obscures views in national parks. A court-imposed deadline is part of a decade long fight over pollution, and that fight may not be over. NPR's Elizabeth Shogren reports.
KB monitors air quality for Grand Canyon2 National Park in Arizona. He has a close-up view of what haze does to one of the country's scenic3 gems4. He recently stood on the canyon's south rim5 with a cell phone, and described what he saw.
Early in the morning like this can see the tempos6 rising up out of the canyon in the forest over on the north rim. The colors are a little bit muted by some of our haze this morning though, so they are not quite as vibrant7 as what they can be.
The haze that clouds the view blows in from industrial plants and urban areas, like Phoenix8 and Los Angeles.
As that air moves across those areas, it picks up its load of pollutants9 and then by the time they get to the Grand Canyon of hundreds of miles away it's mixed into a fairly uniform haze that just sort of blankets the whole area.
In fact B says some haze obscures the Grand Canyon 90 percent of the year. Some days visitors complain.
On the very haziest10 days what you see out there is bluish gray masses without really very much color or texture11.
Haze cloaks many other parks too. And in 1977 Congress said the air of our parks had to be restored to natural conditions. It set a deadline of 2064. The Environmental Protection Agency has been working on one big part of the problem: its emissions12 from older industrial facilities, power plants, smelters, and factories built before 1977. But industry groups have resisted. They already took the agency to court and blocked one cleanup plan. Now they are threatening to do that again, with the EPA rule due today. James S heads the Western Business Round Table.
If it goes forward in its current flawed condition, it will not likely stand legal challenge.
Industry groups complain that the rule will threaten new power plants and other projects. They also say it would give the federal government new power to tell states what to do.
When Washington comes and bulls its way in the west and says,"Hey we know better than you westerners, what's good for your land." Well, they can't these people's backup.
Statements like that get Chris Shaver's backup. She heads the air programs for the National Park Service, and she says the States do want EPA to act.
I don't think it's a valid13 criticism. The States at least in the west have had a very different role of helping14 cross these rules, and the rules I expect would give the states a great deal of authorities to implement15 them in a way that they see fit.
Shaver says the states want that flexibility16 so they can preserve the majestic17 views that bring in millions of visitors. EPA's new plan will have its biggest impact on the west. Another rule that EPA announced last month is supposed to help clear up eastern parks. At the Grand Canyon KB predicts EPA's plan will help bring back views that now only some visitors see, on a good day.
The reds and the golden tans of the cliffs are shining, and shadows are sharp and clear. When you look over the north rim, it looks like you could almost reach out and touch it. It's hard to believe that it's ten miles away.
What parks and visitors see in the future could depend on what EPA decides to do today.
Elizabeth Shogren, NPR News, Washington.
KB monitors air quality for Grand Canyon2 National Park in Arizona. He has a close-up view of what haze does to one of the country's scenic3 gems4. He recently stood on the canyon's south rim5 with a cell phone, and described what he saw.
Early in the morning like this can see the tempos6 rising up out of the canyon in the forest over on the north rim. The colors are a little bit muted by some of our haze this morning though, so they are not quite as vibrant7 as what they can be.
The haze that clouds the view blows in from industrial plants and urban areas, like Phoenix8 and Los Angeles.
As that air moves across those areas, it picks up its load of pollutants9 and then by the time they get to the Grand Canyon of hundreds of miles away it's mixed into a fairly uniform haze that just sort of blankets the whole area.
In fact B says some haze obscures the Grand Canyon 90 percent of the year. Some days visitors complain.
On the very haziest10 days what you see out there is bluish gray masses without really very much color or texture11.
Haze cloaks many other parks too. And in 1977 Congress said the air of our parks had to be restored to natural conditions. It set a deadline of 2064. The Environmental Protection Agency has been working on one big part of the problem: its emissions12 from older industrial facilities, power plants, smelters, and factories built before 1977. But industry groups have resisted. They already took the agency to court and blocked one cleanup plan. Now they are threatening to do that again, with the EPA rule due today. James S heads the Western Business Round Table.
If it goes forward in its current flawed condition, it will not likely stand legal challenge.
Industry groups complain that the rule will threaten new power plants and other projects. They also say it would give the federal government new power to tell states what to do.
When Washington comes and bulls its way in the west and says,"Hey we know better than you westerners, what's good for your land." Well, they can't these people's backup.
Statements like that get Chris Shaver's backup. She heads the air programs for the National Park Service, and she says the States do want EPA to act.
I don't think it's a valid13 criticism. The States at least in the west have had a very different role of helping14 cross these rules, and the rules I expect would give the states a great deal of authorities to implement15 them in a way that they see fit.
Shaver says the states want that flexibility16 so they can preserve the majestic17 views that bring in millions of visitors. EPA's new plan will have its biggest impact on the west. Another rule that EPA announced last month is supposed to help clear up eastern parks. At the Grand Canyon KB predicts EPA's plan will help bring back views that now only some visitors see, on a good day.
The reds and the golden tans of the cliffs are shining, and shadows are sharp and clear. When you look over the north rim, it looks like you could almost reach out and touch it. It's hard to believe that it's ten miles away.
What parks and visitors see in the future could depend on what EPA decides to do today.
Elizabeth Shogren, NPR News, Washington.
点击收听单词发音
1 haze | |
n.霾,烟雾;懵懂,迷糊;vi.(over)变模糊 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 canyon | |
n.峡谷,溪谷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 scenic | |
adj.自然景色的,景色优美的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 gems | |
growth; economy; management; and customer satisfaction 增长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 rim | |
n.(圆物的)边,轮缘;边界 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 tempos | |
乐曲的速度或拍子( tempo的名词复数 ); (运动或活动的)速度,进度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 vibrant | |
adj.震颤的,响亮的,充满活力的,精力充沛的,(色彩)鲜明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 phoenix | |
n.凤凰,长生(不死)鸟;引申为重生 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 pollutants | |
污染物质(尤指工业废物)( pollutant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 haziest | |
有薄雾的( hazy的最高级 ); 模糊的; 不清楚的; 糊涂的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 texture | |
n.(织物)质地;(材料)构造;结构;肌理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 emissions | |
排放物( emission的名词复数 ); 散发物(尤指气体) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 valid | |
adj.有确实根据的;有效的;正当的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 helping | |
n.食物的一份&adj.帮助人的,辅助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 implement | |
n.(pl.)工具,器具;vt.实行,实施,执行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 flexibility | |
n.柔韧性,弹性,(光的)折射性,灵活性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 majestic | |
adj.雄伟的,壮丽的,庄严的,威严的,崇高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|