-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
Tomorrow the Supreme1 Court considers the issue of discrimination against LGBTQ people in the workplace. Most states do not have explicit2 protections, and in those states the court's decision could have a significant effect. NPR's Leila Fadel reports.
KATHLEEN O'DONNELL: Are you ready to go to the park?
LEILA FADEL, BYLINE3: It's a hectic4 morning for Kathleen O'Donnell and her wife Casey.
O'DONNELL: Yeah, we just got a new kiddo yesterday.
FADEL: Overnight the couple got a 4-year-old foster daughter. Kathleen is getting her ready for the park. Casey's wrangling5 the four dogs after getting their 11-year-old son off to school - a typical day at the O'Donnell house on a tree-lined street in Billings, Mont.
O'DONNELL: So all of my family lives in Billings, so we kind of, you know, with a kid and stuff, decided6 to be around them.
FADEL: But when she and her wife chose to make Billings home in 2014, they knew it came with risks as a same-sex couple. Montana is one of more than two dozen states that don't have explicit statewide laws that protect LGBTQ people from discrimination in employment, housing and public accommodations. Five cities in Montana have local nondiscrimination ordinances8, but Billings - the largest city in Montana - is not one of them. That became clear quickly. When Kathleen found a prospective9 home, the landlord handed her an application. Under spouse's name, she wrote Casey.
O'DONNELL: And he asked me, like, OK, well, is it a girl or a boy? Which is an odd question to ask someone.
FADEL: She said girl.
O'DONNELL: And so when I did that, that's when he's like, oh, I don't rent to your kind here.
FADEL: They found a different place to live. Two years later Kathleen landed a new job at a local auto10 dealership11. She says the owner's son called her names.
O'DONNELL: And he felt it was OK to make names based on my appearance. And so they did not refer to me by Kathleen; they would refer to me like Bob.
FADEL: She needed the job. Everyone else was kind, so she stayed. A few days before her six-month probationary12 period was up, her supervisor13 fired her.
O'DONNELL: I just looked at him. I was like, why am I being fired? I was like, I've never been in trouble. I've shown up to work. And he said, it's because the owner does not like that you're gay.
FADEL: The dealership would not comment on O'Donnell's firing.
O'DONNELL: So I called the Montana state employment and told them my story. And they're like, yeah, unfortunately, there's nothing we can do for you.
FADEL: Gender14 identity and sexual orientation15 are not protected classes under Montana state law. Now, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission says Title VII, the federal statute16 that bars work discrimination on the basis of sex, does protect those categories. But the courts are split on whether Title VII actually includes LGBTQ people. This week the Supreme Court will hear three cases - two on sexual orientation and one on gender identity.
ADAM ROMERO: What these cases will decide is, does the federal statute that prohibits sex discrimination in employment cover discrimination on the basis of someone's sexual orientation or their gender identity? Because those forms of discrimination are sex-based.
O'DONNELL: That's Andrew Romero (ph), the federal policy director at the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law. He's referring to Title VII. And what the court decides will have a ripple17 effect beyond employment.
ROMERO: The question of discrimination in housing, in education, in public accommodations, in credit and other vital spheres of our lives, there are statutes18 that prohibit sex discrimination in those settings, and so the Supreme Court's decision in the employment context will inform courts decisions in these other contexts as well.
LISA FULLERTON: Historically, sex has been biology-based, and its association is the basis for government programs that were written to help women.
FADEL: Lisa Fullerton owns the San Antonio-based company A Novel Idea, a group of fast-food franchises19. Texas, like Montana, does not have explicit LGBTQ anti-discrimination protections, although San Antonio does.
FULLERTON: When a person's sex is arbitrarily defined or interpreted by judges or government, the opportunities are actually going to vanish for the women that they were designed to benefit.
FADEL: She says she employs LGBTQ people but is concerned about government overreach.
FULLERTON: The fear is that, if handled through the court, it might brutally20 force inclusion, which could be seen as intolerant of the rights and differences of people of the cisgender orientation.
FADEL: Back in Billings, the mayor is closely watching the Supreme Court cases. Bill Cole says there are two reasons the city does not have a nondiscrimination ordinance7. Montana state laws, he says, dictate21 that an employer can't dismiss someone without good cause once their probationary period ends and...
BILL COLE: Anything that we do may be made moot22 by cases now pending23 before the United States Supreme Court.
FADEL: In 2014 the city considered passing a protections ordinance, but the mayor at the time cast the deciding vote, saying Billings just isn't ready. That's when Reverend Sarah Beck at Billings Grace United Methodist Church decided if the city wasn't ready to say we'll protect you, her church would. It began the Rainbow Coffee House, a meeting space for LGBTQ teens.
SARAH BECK: If our community isn't going to create safe space, how do we find safe space for them? And so that's kind of where the Rainbow Coffee House came out of, was sort of people in the community saying, we want our community to be safe for people.
FADEL: Last year that safe space was defaced multiple times with anti-gay flyers, a swastika spray-painted on the rainbow flag that hangs in the church window, another on a church door, and outside a church sign was spray painted with the words no gays. Beck says community leaders like Mayor Cole and others condemned24 the incidents and stood by the church.
BECK: That is all wonderful. But at the same time, what is the expectation when the message that you send to the community is, these people don't need to be protected? Then these sorts of things are inevitable25.
UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: No piggyback rides.
FADEL: On this day, teens lounge in the grass. Some are playing cards, others roughhousing and laughing. This place, it's welcoming. But these high schoolers, Beck says, may graduate into a city and maybe a nation that's not.
Leila Fadel, NPR News, Billings.
1 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 explicit | |
adj.详述的,明确的;坦率的;显然的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 hectic | |
adj.肺病的;消耗热的;发热的;闹哄哄的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 wrangling | |
v.争吵,争论,口角( wrangle的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 ordinance | |
n.法令;条令;条例 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 ordinances | |
n.条例,法令( ordinance的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 prospective | |
adj.预期的,未来的,前瞻性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 auto | |
n.(=automobile)(口语)汽车 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 dealership | |
n.商品特许经销处 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 probationary | |
试用的,缓刑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 supervisor | |
n.监督人,管理人,检查员,督学,主管,导师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 gender | |
n.(生理上的)性,(名词、代词等的)性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 orientation | |
n.方向,目标;熟悉,适应,情况介绍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 statute | |
n.成文法,法令,法规;章程,规则,条例 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 ripple | |
n.涟波,涟漪,波纹,粗钢梳;vt.使...起涟漪,使起波纹; vi.呈波浪状,起伏前进 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 statutes | |
成文法( statute的名词复数 ); 法令; 法规; 章程 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 franchises | |
n.(尤指选举议员的)选举权( franchise的名词复数 );参政权;获特许权的商业机构(或服务);(公司授予的)特许经销权v.给…以特许权,出售特许权( franchise的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 brutally | |
adv.残忍地,野蛮地,冷酷无情地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 dictate | |
v.口授;(使)听写;指令,指示,命令 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 moot | |
v.提出;adj.未决议的;n.大会;辩论会 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 pending | |
prep.直到,等待…期间;adj.待定的;迫近的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 condemned | |
adj. 被责难的, 被宣告有罪的 动词condemn的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 inevitable | |
adj.不可避免的,必然发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|