-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
DAVID GREENE, HOST:
We have reached the first Monday in October. And that, among other things, means that the United States Supreme1 Court formally opens a new term. It is a very different place since 2018, with conservatives now holding a firm majority on the court. NPR legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg reports.
NINA TOTENBERG, BYLINE2: The upcoming Supreme Court term will likely be a march to the right on almost every issue that's a flashpoint in American society - abortion3, guns, gay rights, the separation of church and state, immigration and presidential power. And that's just the beginning. Headed to the court are cases testing the power of Congress to get information from the executive branch that's relevant to congressional oversight4 - and potentially to impeachment5.
Clearly, President Trump6 had something like that in mind when he had this to say about impeachment late in September.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: It shouldn't be allowed. There should be a way of stopping it, maybe legally through the courts.
TOTENBERG: With a newly energized7 conservative majority in place, Chief Justice John Roberts occasionally splits from fellow conservatives, as he did in upholding Obamacare in 2012 and in repudiating8 the citizenship9 question on the census10 seven years later. But usually, on the big issues, as Supreme Court advocate Tom Goldstein puts it...
TOM GOLDSTEIN: The chief justice does seem to be a solid conservative vote. The disagreement among the right in the Supreme Court has been about, how fast do you move?
TOTENBERG: The first place that disagreement could become apparent is on abortion in a case that asked the court to essentially11 reverse a 2016 decision that struck down a Texas law that threatened the very existence of most clinics that perform abortions12. Goldstein, who's publisher of the leading Supreme Court blog, expects the court to eventually reverse Roe13 v. Wade14 outright15 or hollow it out over time.
GOLDSTEIN: It's coming, but nobody quite knows whether it's in one year, five years or maybe 10.
TOTENBERG: Also before the court is a gun case, the first major test of gun regulations in the 10 years since the justices ruled that there is a constitutional right to own a gun for self-defense in one's home. Court observers have long attributed the 10-year hiatus on gun cases to a closely divided court on which neither the four conservatives nor the four liberals were sure how Justice Kennedy would cast his deciding vote. But now Kennedy is retired16, replaced by Justice Kavanaugh, who, on the lower court, was a critic of most gun regulations and a strong supporter of expansive gun rights.
Also before the court this term are major questions involving the separation of church and state. For generations, the court sought to erect17 a relatively18 high wall of separation, but that's begun to change. And religious rights advocates are poised19 to pounce20. Mark Rienzi is president of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty.
MARK RIENZI: I actually can't recall a time in the last 20 years that there were this many key issues that seemed ready for decision and primed for decision.
TOTENBERG: In particular, Rienzi and others have set their sights on invalidating or undermining provisions in most state constitutions that bar direct or indirect aid to religious schools. Former Solicitor21 General Paul Clement22.
PAUL CLEMENT: The mood music of the court is that they would probably say that that's just discrimination on the basis of religion and that's forbidden by the federal constitution.
TOTENBERG: Moving on to another hot-button issue, the court will hear a case that tests whether employers are free to fire gay employees because of their sexual orientation23 or transgender employees because of their gender24 identity. The 1964 Civil Rights Act bars discrimination in employment, quote, "because of sex." The fired employees contend that language protects them from such discharges. The employers argue that the law was never meant to cover gay or transgender employees.
Then, too, there are a variety of immigration cases, the biggest being the Trump administration's attempt to roll back the Obama administration program that currently protects from deportation25 some 700 to 800,000 so-called DREAMers brought to the U.S. by their parents when they were children without legal authorization26. In short, the cases before the court are a legal Rorschach test if ever there was one.
Nina Totenberg, NPR News, Washington.
(SOUNDBITE OF TINGVALL TRIO'S "KARUSELLEN")
1 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 abortion | |
n.流产,堕胎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 oversight | |
n.勘漏,失察,疏忽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 impeachment | |
n.弹劾;控告;怀疑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 energized | |
v.给予…精力,能量( energize的过去式和过去分词 );使通电 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 repudiating | |
v.(正式地)否认( repudiate的现在分词 );拒绝接受;拒绝与…往来;拒不履行(法律义务) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 citizenship | |
n.市民权,公民权,国民的义务(身份) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 census | |
n.(官方的)人口调查,人口普查 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 abortions | |
n.小产( abortion的名词复数 );小产胎儿;(计划)等中止或夭折;败育 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 roe | |
n.鱼卵;獐鹿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 wade | |
v.跋涉,涉水;n.跋涉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 outright | |
adv.坦率地;彻底地;立即;adj.无疑的;彻底的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 retired | |
adj.隐退的,退休的,退役的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 erect | |
n./v.树立,建立,使竖立;adj.直立的,垂直的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 relatively | |
adv.比较...地,相对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 poised | |
a.摆好姿势不动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 pounce | |
n.猛扑;v.猛扑,突然袭击,欣然同意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 solicitor | |
n.初级律师,事务律师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 clement | |
adj.仁慈的;温和的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 orientation | |
n.方向,目标;熟悉,适应,情况介绍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 gender | |
n.(生理上的)性,(名词、代词等的)性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 deportation | |
n.驱逐,放逐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 authorization | |
n.授权,委任状 | |
参考例句: |
|
|