-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:
We're going to return now to a story you may remember from a few years back - a cheating scandal in the Atlanta public school system. Prosecutors1 charged that teachers and administrators2 conspired3 to change incorrect answers to inflate4 scores on high-stakes standardized5 tests. A grand jury indicted6 the Atlanta school superintendent7 and 34 other educators. Twelve went to trial. And, in 2015, all but one of them were found guilty of racketeering, a charge often used to prosecute9 mafia figures. And, in some ways, they were treated as such. Most were led out of court in handcuffs. One of those convicted, Shani Robinson, is free now, pending10 appeal.
She continues to maintain her innocence11 and is making her case to the public in a new book. It's called "None Of The Above: The Untold12 Story Of The Atlanta Public School's Cheating Scandal, Corporate13 Greed, And The Criminalization Of Educators." Shani Robinson told me one reason she wrote the book was for her son.
SHANI ROBINSON: I wanted him to know the truth about what actually happened to me when he got older. And I also wrote this book to set the record straight and to ask the question - who should really be held accountable for cheating the children? Our children have been cheated by those who have willfully torn apart black communities through displacement14 and gentrification, underfunded and privatized public schools and, then, have criminalized black educators for a dysfunctional system that was designed to fail.
MARTIN: So let me...
ROBINSON: And I feel like this...
MARTIN: OK. Go ahead. I'm sorry. Go ahead.
ROBINSON: I was going to say I feel like this case is extremely important because public education is under attack, as we've seen, in places where teachers are striking. And the cheating scandal was used to portray15 public education as a failure and justify16 privatizing schools. And so many people are resisting that right now. And so we believe that, you know, winning the freedom of Atlanta teachers will be a win for educators everywhere.
MARTIN: So let me be very clear. You say you never erased18 test scores. Is that - that's...
ROBINSON: Correct.
MARTIN: You never erased test scores. You never participated in any coordinated19 effort to erase17 and improve test scores.
ROBINSON: That is correct. And I can go into the day in question, how I was dragged into the scandal, you know, if you'd like. But, no. I never erased any answers...
MARTIN: And are you saying that that never happened?
ROBINSON: ...On any of my students' test.
MARTIN: But you're saying that never happened at all? Are you just saying you did not participate in that?
ROBINSON: I'm saying I did not participate in that.
MARTIN: You were very critical of most of the entities20 who were involved with this whole situation. You feel that the media was biased21. You feel that the courts were very biased. You feel that the judge gave, you know, biased instructions to the jury, that he gave biased and, in fact, incorrect instructions to the jury. So you document all this. But how did this start to begin with? I mean, this trial was lengthy22, expensive and embarrassing. And I think that it is fair to say that, you know, most cities don't like negative attention being drawn23 to them. And we know that Atlanta particularly did not appreciate this negative attention being drawn to them. So what's your theory about why all this happened to begin with?
ROBINSON: Well, that's a good question because when you think about cheating on standardized tests, this is something that was happening over the entire country. Over 40 states have had cheating allegations. In Washington, D.C., there were 103 schools that were flagged for high levels of suspiciously high test scores. And so to think that what happened in Atlanta was, you know, like, an anomaly, you know, that was the biggest thing. Why were the educators in Atlanta charged with racketeering when this was happening over the entire country? And, in the book, we outline Atlanta's history of displacement and the destruction of black communities. And I think the criminalization of black educators was the next legacy24 in that history.
MARTIN: What's your argument for why this happened in this place at this time? I mean, Atlanta has an African-American mayor. The DA is African-American. The two prosecutors are African-American. I mean, what would be their motive25?
ROBINSON: You know, I don't have the answer to that, you know? I don't.
MARTIN: But you seem to think race played a role.
ROBINSON: I absolutely think race played a role.
MARTIN: OK. What role do you think it played?
ROBINSON: There were some white educators who were implicated26 in that GBI report, and none of them were indicted. And I can't help to think that if it was 35 white educators that it would have gotten to this point where they were charged with racketeering.
MARTIN: Why do you think it is that almost two dozen - what was it? - 21 of the educators who were accused entered guilty pleas?
ROBINSON: You know, there were some people who testified during the trial that they only took a plea deal because they were stressed out from the entire ordeal27. And some people - you know, they actually blamed it on No Child Left Behind, that they didn't want their schools to close because, under the No Child Left Behind Act, after a certain number of years, they could close your school. They could turn it into a charter school, or it could be taken over by the state.
And so I was facing 25 years in prison. There were some people who were facing 40 years in prison. And so we had that option of facing decades in prison or doing community service, saying that we're guilty, you know, and maybe paying a fine. And so that was a tough decision to make, having to spend decades in prison or just say that you're guilty.
MARTIN: But you chose not to. And that's one of the things that I think stands out about your book of the - all the people who are accused. And I do want to mention that, to this day, you have refused, despite the fact that you were pregnant at the time, the entire time of the trial, that your child was born just days after the trial concluded - you have, to this day, refused to apologize or admit guilt8 because you said that you weren't guilty. And I have to, you know, ask. Like, what is it that gives you such strong conviction that this is what you have to do?
ROBINSON: Because I know that I'm on the right side of justice. And I even get emotional talking about it, but the thought of being blamed for something that I did not do is horrifying28.
MARTIN: Take your time.
ROBINSON: Here I was facing 25 years in prison for something that I didn't do. And I felt like if I was on the right side of justice that, one day, I would be vindicated29. That was the moment that I decided30 I would never take a plea deal.
MARTIN: I mean, do you think anybody is guilty here? I mean, the fact of the matter is that the test scores are published every year in Atlanta, as they are in a lot of cities. And people looking at them thought that there were anomalies. They thought that there were swings in test scores that were not explained by kind of the normal variation that one sees. Do you think that anybody is guilty here? Was anybody cheating?
ROBINSON: Absolutely, absolutely. The education officials and policymakers that have pushed high-stakes testing - that is who has cheated these children. That is who is guilty, which is why you have all of these states that have had high levels of erasures. And no one has done anything about it.
MARTIN: That is Shani Robinson. Her book, "None Of The Above: The Untold Story Of The Atlanta Public Schools Cheating Scandal, Corporate Greed, And The Criminalization Of Educators," is out now. Her co-author is Anna Simonton. Shani Robinson, thanks so much for talking to us.
ROBINSON: Thank you so much for having me.
1 prosecutors | |
检举人( prosecutor的名词复数 ); 告发人; 起诉人; 公诉人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 administrators | |
n.管理者( administrator的名词复数 );有管理(或行政)才能的人;(由遗嘱检验法庭指定的)遗产管理人;奉派暂管主教教区的牧师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 conspired | |
密谋( conspire的过去式和过去分词 ); 搞阴谋; (事件等)巧合; 共同导致 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 inflate | |
vt.使膨胀,使骄傲,抬高(物价) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 standardized | |
adj.标准化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 indicted | |
控告,起诉( indict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 superintendent | |
n.监督人,主管,总监;(英国)警务长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 guilt | |
n.犯罪;内疚;过失,罪责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 prosecute | |
vt.告发;进行;vi.告发,起诉,作检察官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 pending | |
prep.直到,等待…期间;adj.待定的;迫近的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 innocence | |
n.无罪;天真;无害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 untold | |
adj.数不清的,无数的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 corporate | |
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 displacement | |
n.移置,取代,位移,排水量 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 portray | |
v.描写,描述;画(人物、景象等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 justify | |
vt.证明…正当(或有理),为…辩护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 erase | |
v.擦掉;消除某事物的痕迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 erased | |
v.擦掉( erase的过去式和过去分词 );抹去;清除 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 coordinated | |
adj.协调的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 entities | |
实体对像; 实体,独立存在体,实际存在物( entity的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 biased | |
a.有偏见的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 lengthy | |
adj.漫长的,冗长的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 legacy | |
n.遗产,遗赠;先人(或过去)留下的东西 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 motive | |
n.动机,目的;adv.发动的,运动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 implicated | |
adj.密切关联的;牵涉其中的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 ordeal | |
n.苦难经历,(尤指对品格、耐力的)严峻考验 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 horrifying | |
a.令人震惊的,使人毛骨悚然的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 vindicated | |
v.澄清(某人/某事物)受到的责难或嫌疑( vindicate的过去式和过去分词 );表明或证明(所争辩的事物)属实、正当、有效等;维护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|