-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
SCOTT SIMON, HOST:
Should Republicans still call themselves the party of Lincoln? Kevin McCarthy, the House Republican leader, declared, we are the party of Lincoln, as he contended President Trump1 was not racist2 for suggesting four Democratic representatives - U.S. citizens who are also women of color - should go back to the places they came from.
But it might be telling to remember what Abraham Lincoln thought of a political movement of the 1850s called the American Party. They called themselves the Know-Nothings because they were encouraged to say they knew nothing about the secretive party's membership. The Know-Nothings detested3 and feared immigration. They believed an influx4 of Catholic immigrants from Germany and Ireland were part of a papal conspiracy5 to overthrow6 white Protestant America. They wanted to restrict immigration and keep foreign-born citizens from voting. The Know-Nothings were not a negligible splinter group. They won more than 40 seats in Congress in 1854. Millard Fillmore, their candidate for president in 1856, won 21% of the vote.
Lincoln wrote his old friend Joshua Speed in 1855, I am not a Know-Nothing. That is certain. How could I be? How can anyone who abhors7 the oppression of negroes be in favor of degrading classes of white people? Our progress in degeneracy appears to me to be pretty rapid. As a nation, we began by declaring that all men are created equal. We now practically read it, all men are created equal except Negroes. When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read, all men are created equal, except Negroes and foreigners and Catholics.
Lincoln, like many great figures, can be quoted to bolster8 almost any position. But Sean Trainor, a lecturer at the University of Florida who has written about the period, told us modern Republican immigration policy bears no resemblance to the policies of Lincoln and his generation of Republicans. The party's founders9 fought against proposed limits on the number of immigrant arrivals. Today's Republicans do the opposite.
Maybe no political party can forever be identified with its founders. Many Democrats10 no longer call their annual fundraisers Jefferson-Jackson Day dinners because Thomas Jefferson wrote all men are created equal but still owned slaves, and Andrew Jackson brutalized Native Americans. But can Republicans who don't see bigotry11 in President Trump's insult continue to claim Abe Lincoln as the brand name of their party?
(SOUNDBITE OF BLUE DOT SESSIONS' "HUNDRED MILE")
1 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 racist | |
n.种族主义者,种族主义分子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 detested | |
v.憎恶,嫌恶,痛恨( detest的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 influx | |
n.流入,注入 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 conspiracy | |
n.阴谋,密谋,共谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 overthrow | |
v.推翻,打倒,颠覆;n.推翻,瓦解,颠覆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 abhors | |
v.憎恶( abhor的第三人称单数 );(厌恶地)回避;拒绝;淘汰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 bolster | |
n.枕垫;v.支持,鼓励 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 founders | |
n.创始人( founder的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 bigotry | |
n.偏见,偏执,持偏见的行为[态度]等 | |
参考例句: |
|
|