-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Gary:Water … Do we have enough of it? Will this precious resource be the cause of future wars? Turn the pages of your newspaper, tune1 in to the radio news: these topics appear over and over again. Water is a subject that affects us all; it touches our lives in different ways.
ClipVOX POPSComments from people in the fieldGary:The facts and figures that lie behind these human stories are dramatic. In this series, we consider the themes that feature in BBC World Service news programmes. Today's “big story” is water. Well focus on some of the issues and, of course, the language behind the topic, and well look at how water is reported in the news. As science journalist Helen Sewell explains, “water” is a very broad subject.
ClipHelen Sewell, BBC Science Radio UnitThere are issues like sanitation3（环境卫生，卫生设备）, the availability of clean water, of water for you to wash your hands in after you've been to the toilet, for example; to make sure that there are sewage systems (污水管道系统)in place - and some of the poorer countries don't have those sewage systems. And then, of course, if the water from peoples toilets gets mixed up with drinking water, then you've got all sorts of problems and that can lead to many, many thousands of deaths. More than a billion people worldwide already lack enough safe water to meet the minimum health levels. And the UN Environment programme says that the water shortage is the second most worrying problem this millennium4 - after global warming.
Gary:Helen Sewell of the BBC Science Radio Unit. Huge numbers of people around the world do not have enough safe water to drink. Many more do not have access to proper sanitation. But what's the reason for this water shortage? Scientists tell us that the amount of available water isn't changing - so are we just using more of it?
ClipHelen Sewell, BBC Science Radio UnitWe are using more of it. The world population is growing rapidly. So, of course, more people use more water. And also more people need more food. So as more crops are planted, more water is needed to make sure that those crops grow so that we can be fed as well as watered. And one of the other reasons that were using more water for agriculture is that, in places, where there was a lot of drought（干旱） and the crops were naturally, I suppose, drought-resistant, they've been replaced with these high-yield “miracle seeds”, which basically provide much more food from the same crop as you would have from the drought-resistant crop, but of course they need much more water to water them. And in addition, some people don't water their crops in the most efficient way, so through poor irrigation（灌溉）methods a lot of water is lost as well.
Gary: Water shortages are made worse through poor management of water resourcesand inefficient5 （无效率的）watering of the land. In addition, safe water can become contaminated（污染） as a result of poor sanitation or the chemical fertilisers used in agriculture. So, how is it possible to ensure that people everywhere have access to the water they need? Well, one answer is to build dams. But, of course, dams don't provide a straightforward6 solution. They may supply energy and fresh water to those who live nearby, but there's often a price to pay. In some cases, millions of people are forced to leave their homes before the area is flooded. In other cases, the people who live downstream may suddenly find themselves without the water they once enjoyed. When we bear in mind factors like these, we begin to understand how water issues can lead to political disagreement and other tensions.
Clip Helen Sewell, BBC Science Radio UnitAt the moment Bangladesh is suffering because India has diverted（分神） and dammed so many of its water sources. And Bangladesh depends very heavily on rivers that originate in India. In Israel … Israel takes water wherever it can, which means that Syria and Jordan and the Palestinian townships in Israel don't get as much water as they want. And that can make for political rows as well. And in an unstable7 region（不稳定区） that could be dangerous, as the water shortage becomes more and more severe. Relations between Botswana and Namibia have been severely8 strained by Namibia's plans to construct a pipeline（管道） to divert water from a shared river … and Ethiopia plans to take more water from the Nile - even though Egypt is heavily dependent on those waters for irrigation and power. So, it could cause problems. And, in fact in 1995, the Vice2 President of the World Bank made a much-quoted prediction for the next millennium. He said if the wars of this century were fought over oil, the wars of the next century will be fought over water.
Gary: Who owns the scarce commodity（稀缺商品） that runs through our rivers, or which liesdeep below the ground? Water is a highly political issue. And that explainspartly why it so often becomes a story in the news. But what is the BBC's rolein reporting stories like these - and how do they do it? I put those questions toHelen Sewell, who helps to provide the BBC's news coverage9.
Clip Helen Sewell, BBC Science Radio UnitWell, were here to educate people and to inform people. So really we should be highlighting the issues as they arise and telling them in a very factual way without bias（偏见） to one side or another if there's a conflict. And we do tend to look at crises because that's what people are interested in. So, if there's a major flood or a drought, we tend to focus on how many people are without water; how many people could die. And that's rather morbid（病态的）, but in order to be part of news programming we have to have a story - a “new story” that our listeners haven't heard before, and that they're going to be interested in hearing.
Gary: When, as a journalist, you're reporting stories about crises around the world, to do with water issues, is it difficult to find the sort of language that's appropriate for the news story?
Helen: It's not a difficult thing to do. What we tend to do is avoid using all the adjectives that fiction writers would use. So we wouldn't say, for example, “it's a most terrible, awful, appalling10 drought” … we would just say “there's a drought”. We might say “the drought is the worst to hit which ever country it is for the past 30 years and X million people are affected11 by it”. Now, everybody knows that if so many million people are affected and it's such a bad drought, then it is going to be terrible, appalling and awful. So we don't need to use the emotive language there.
Gary; WaterAid is a charity whose offices are based in London next to the River Thames. I decided12 to get their view on news coverage about water.
Clip Sharon Brand-Self, Media Manager, WaterAid Gary: I've come to see Sharon Brand-Self who's the media manager for Water Aid - that's the UK Charity that helps the worlds poorest people gain access to water, sanitation and hygiene13 education. And were sitting next to the River Thames, which runs through the centre of London … in sight of the Houses of Parliament and the Palace of Westminster … and it's also a historic site, I think, Sharon?
Sharon: Yes, I believe were actually over one of the main sewerage systems（污水系统） that runs through the whole of London. And it probably dates back about 150 years when we first actually started pioneering a sewerage system to clean up London.
Gary: If you look at the way that water issues are reported in the newspapers today, or the kind of reports we hear in news programming, what's your view as part of a campaigning organisation14, a Water organisation, about the way that water is reported?
Sharon: I think that there has been a noticeable change in the Media as to how water and sanitation is covered. The World Summit in Johannesburg last August really did help change that agenda. It put development into the public domain15, as something that would be of interest to people. So we were getting a lot of attention. The UK's main newspapers and television and radio news were all wanting to know about that very human side: how are the poorest people affected by the lack of most basic needs like water and sanitation? And that's something that had been difficult to sell to the Media in the past. The Media were wanting to know more about water wars and that kind of thing, rather than that very human need.
Gary: That's been my experience, just talking to journalists at the BBC World Service, that they tend to react to crises or to specific events happening. Is that something that you've noticed as well?
Sharon: Definitely. I think that's the nature of news, it kind of ticks off one of the requirements, doesn't it, for a journalist: this is something happening now. It also ticks off another one: it's bad news, and that always seems to sell very well in the UK. But I do think that behind the news there are always these more deep-rooted issues. Before any disaster, emergency - especially in the Developing World - happens, there are development issues that could have solved the problem before it even started, or prevented the problem. And I think that has certainly come to the Publics attention more in the past year or maybe two years; where people are thinking: no it's poverty at the root of these problems, and lets look at how we can change those and get some practical solutions going.
Gary: What, as a water charity and as a Media manager for a water charity would you ideally like to see reported in news bulletins?
Sharon: It's incredibly important to keep reminding people of the fact that were looking at 1.1 billion people without any safe water to drink; 2.4 billion people without any sanitation, and that problem is getting worse rather than better. Id also like to see much more attention paid to the targets that were set at the World Summit last year, which was a piece of hope really for Africa especially, setting the target that by 2015 wed16 be halving17 the amount of people who are having to live without water and sanitation. And I don't want that to be a forgotten issue now. We really think it's the Medias role to help keep it in the public eye, to keep saying: OK we know you set these targets to the worlds governments, but now what are you doing about it?
Gary: I was talking to Sharon Brand-Self, Media Manager for the UK Water Charity, WaterAid.(本文由在线英语听力室整理编辑)
ClipVOX POPSComments from people in the fieldGary:The facts and figures that lie behind these human stories are dramatic. In this series, we consider the themes that feature in BBC World Service news programmes. Today's “big story” is water. Well focus on some of the issues and, of course, the language behind the topic, and well look at how water is reported in the news. As science journalist Helen Sewell explains, “water” is a very broad subject.
ClipHelen Sewell, BBC Science Radio UnitThere are issues like sanitation3（环境卫生，卫生设备）, the availability of clean water, of water for you to wash your hands in after you've been to the toilet, for example; to make sure that there are sewage systems (污水管道系统)in place - and some of the poorer countries don't have those sewage systems. And then, of course, if the water from peoples toilets gets mixed up with drinking water, then you've got all sorts of problems and that can lead to many, many thousands of deaths. More than a billion people worldwide already lack enough safe water to meet the minimum health levels. And the UN Environment programme says that the water shortage is the second most worrying problem this millennium4 - after global warming.
Gary:Helen Sewell of the BBC Science Radio Unit. Huge numbers of people around the world do not have enough safe water to drink. Many more do not have access to proper sanitation. But what's the reason for this water shortage? Scientists tell us that the amount of available water isn't changing - so are we just using more of it?
ClipHelen Sewell, BBC Science Radio UnitWe are using more of it. The world population is growing rapidly. So, of course, more people use more water. And also more people need more food. So as more crops are planted, more water is needed to make sure that those crops grow so that we can be fed as well as watered. And one of the other reasons that were using more water for agriculture is that, in places, where there was a lot of drought（干旱） and the crops were naturally, I suppose, drought-resistant, they've been replaced with these high-yield “miracle seeds”, which basically provide much more food from the same crop as you would have from the drought-resistant crop, but of course they need much more water to water them. And in addition, some people don't water their crops in the most efficient way, so through poor irrigation（灌溉）methods a lot of water is lost as well.
Gary: Water shortages are made worse through poor management of water resourcesand inefficient5 （无效率的）watering of the land. In addition, safe water can become contaminated（污染） as a result of poor sanitation or the chemical fertilisers used in agriculture. So, how is it possible to ensure that people everywhere have access to the water they need? Well, one answer is to build dams. But, of course, dams don't provide a straightforward6 solution. They may supply energy and fresh water to those who live nearby, but there's often a price to pay. In some cases, millions of people are forced to leave their homes before the area is flooded. In other cases, the people who live downstream may suddenly find themselves without the water they once enjoyed. When we bear in mind factors like these, we begin to understand how water issues can lead to political disagreement and other tensions.
Clip Helen Sewell, BBC Science Radio UnitAt the moment Bangladesh is suffering because India has diverted（分神） and dammed so many of its water sources. And Bangladesh depends very heavily on rivers that originate in India. In Israel … Israel takes water wherever it can, which means that Syria and Jordan and the Palestinian townships in Israel don't get as much water as they want. And that can make for political rows as well. And in an unstable7 region（不稳定区） that could be dangerous, as the water shortage becomes more and more severe. Relations between Botswana and Namibia have been severely8 strained by Namibia's plans to construct a pipeline（管道） to divert water from a shared river … and Ethiopia plans to take more water from the Nile - even though Egypt is heavily dependent on those waters for irrigation and power. So, it could cause problems. And, in fact in 1995, the Vice2 President of the World Bank made a much-quoted prediction for the next millennium. He said if the wars of this century were fought over oil, the wars of the next century will be fought over water.
Gary: Who owns the scarce commodity（稀缺商品） that runs through our rivers, or which liesdeep below the ground? Water is a highly political issue. And that explainspartly why it so often becomes a story in the news. But what is the BBC's rolein reporting stories like these - and how do they do it? I put those questions toHelen Sewell, who helps to provide the BBC's news coverage9.
Clip Helen Sewell, BBC Science Radio UnitWell, were here to educate people and to inform people. So really we should be highlighting the issues as they arise and telling them in a very factual way without bias（偏见） to one side or another if there's a conflict. And we do tend to look at crises because that's what people are interested in. So, if there's a major flood or a drought, we tend to focus on how many people are without water; how many people could die. And that's rather morbid（病态的）, but in order to be part of news programming we have to have a story - a “new story” that our listeners haven't heard before, and that they're going to be interested in hearing.
Gary: When, as a journalist, you're reporting stories about crises around the world, to do with water issues, is it difficult to find the sort of language that's appropriate for the news story?
Helen: It's not a difficult thing to do. What we tend to do is avoid using all the adjectives that fiction writers would use. So we wouldn't say, for example, “it's a most terrible, awful, appalling10 drought” … we would just say “there's a drought”. We might say “the drought is the worst to hit which ever country it is for the past 30 years and X million people are affected11 by it”. Now, everybody knows that if so many million people are affected and it's such a bad drought, then it is going to be terrible, appalling and awful. So we don't need to use the emotive language there.
Gary; WaterAid is a charity whose offices are based in London next to the River Thames. I decided12 to get their view on news coverage about water.
Clip Sharon Brand-Self, Media Manager, WaterAid Gary: I've come to see Sharon Brand-Self who's the media manager for Water Aid - that's the UK Charity that helps the worlds poorest people gain access to water, sanitation and hygiene13 education. And were sitting next to the River Thames, which runs through the centre of London … in sight of the Houses of Parliament and the Palace of Westminster … and it's also a historic site, I think, Sharon?
Sharon: Yes, I believe were actually over one of the main sewerage systems（污水系统） that runs through the whole of London. And it probably dates back about 150 years when we first actually started pioneering a sewerage system to clean up London.
Gary: If you look at the way that water issues are reported in the newspapers today, or the kind of reports we hear in news programming, what's your view as part of a campaigning organisation14, a Water organisation, about the way that water is reported?
Sharon: I think that there has been a noticeable change in the Media as to how water and sanitation is covered. The World Summit in Johannesburg last August really did help change that agenda. It put development into the public domain15, as something that would be of interest to people. So we were getting a lot of attention. The UK's main newspapers and television and radio news were all wanting to know about that very human side: how are the poorest people affected by the lack of most basic needs like water and sanitation? And that's something that had been difficult to sell to the Media in the past. The Media were wanting to know more about water wars and that kind of thing, rather than that very human need.
Gary: That's been my experience, just talking to journalists at the BBC World Service, that they tend to react to crises or to specific events happening. Is that something that you've noticed as well?
Sharon: Definitely. I think that's the nature of news, it kind of ticks off one of the requirements, doesn't it, for a journalist: this is something happening now. It also ticks off another one: it's bad news, and that always seems to sell very well in the UK. But I do think that behind the news there are always these more deep-rooted issues. Before any disaster, emergency - especially in the Developing World - happens, there are development issues that could have solved the problem before it even started, or prevented the problem. And I think that has certainly come to the Publics attention more in the past year or maybe two years; where people are thinking: no it's poverty at the root of these problems, and lets look at how we can change those and get some practical solutions going.
Gary: What, as a water charity and as a Media manager for a water charity would you ideally like to see reported in news bulletins?
Sharon: It's incredibly important to keep reminding people of the fact that were looking at 1.1 billion people without any safe water to drink; 2.4 billion people without any sanitation, and that problem is getting worse rather than better. Id also like to see much more attention paid to the targets that were set at the World Summit last year, which was a piece of hope really for Africa especially, setting the target that by 2015 wed16 be halving17 the amount of people who are having to live without water and sanitation. And I don't want that to be a forgotten issue now. We really think it's the Medias role to help keep it in the public eye, to keep saying: OK we know you set these targets to the worlds governments, but now what are you doing about it?
Gary: I was talking to Sharon Brand-Self, Media Manager for the UK Water Charity, WaterAid.(本文由在线英语听力室整理编辑)
点击
收听单词发音
收听单词发音 |
1
tune
|
|
| n.调子；和谐，协调；v.调音，调节，调整 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
vice
|
|
| n.坏事；恶习；[pl.]台钳，老虎钳；adj.副的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
sanitation
|
|
| n.公共卫生，环境卫生，卫生设备 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
millennium
|
|
| n.一千年，千禧年；太平盛世 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
inefficient
|
|
| adj.效率低的，无效的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
straightforward
|
|
| adj.正直的，坦率的；易懂的，简单的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
unstable
|
|
| adj.不稳定的，易变的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
severely
|
|
| adv.严格地；严厉地；非常恶劣地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
coverage
|
|
| n.报导，保险范围，保险额，范围，覆盖 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
appalling
|
|
| adj.骇人听闻的，令人震惊的，可怕的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
affected
|
|
| adj.不自然的，假装的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
12
decided
|
|
| adj.决定了的，坚决的；明显的，明确的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
13
hygiene
|
|
| n.健康法，卫生学 （a.hygienic） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
14
organisation
|
|
| n.组织，安排，团体，有机休 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
15
domain
|
|
| n.(活动等)领域，范围；领地，势力范围 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
16
wed
|
|
| v.娶，嫁，与…结婚 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
17
halving
|
|
| n.对分，二等分，减半[航空、航海]等分v.把…分成两半( halve的现在分词 )；把…减半；对分；平摊 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
购买
在百度中搜索