-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Former federal prosecutor1 discusses where DOJ's case against Trump2 could lead
NPR's Steve Inskeep talks to former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti about whether the Justice Department's investigation4 into former President Trump's handling of documents could lead to charges.
STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
Let's turn now to former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti. Welcome back.
RENATO MARIOTTI: Thanks, Steve.
INSKEEP: I want to ask first about that photo. This is something that was discussed on social media. Byron York, a conservative journalist, talked about it. Trump seemed to have picked it up on his own social media feed, complaining that the FBI photos showed secret documents spread out when they seem originally to have been in an unsecured box in Trump's office. Based on your knowledge of investigations5, how do you think a photo like that would come about?
MARIOTTI: I think it's pretty standard procedure that when you are searching and obtaining evidence, you will, on the scene, for example, take - spread out and take photographs of the evidence you find. So a lot of our listeners may have seen drug photos like this, right? There's a bunch of cocaine6 spread on a table that's photographed. No one thinks that all of the cocaine was just sitting out on the table. But that is what law enforcement does at the scene of the search to document what they found.
INSKEEP: And just to be clear on the law here, as best we understand it, if the documents were just in the box, in the unsecured box in the former president's unsecured office, is he any less guilty?
MARIOTTI: No. In fact, as you mentioned a moment ago, it appears that by - it appears that the former president acknowledged that he knowingly possessed8 the documents. And whether he possessed them in a box or on the floor, it doesn't matter.
INSKEEP: Did you get any insight as to why a Trump lawyer would have signed a sworn statement saying that there were no more relevant documents at Mar-a-Lago when there now seemed to have been many?
MARIOTTI: There's no good reason to do so. And I think it's something that no competent and honest lawyer would have done. Obviously, it appears that what was done was there was an effort to mislead and thwart9 the Justice Department investigation. I mean, the Justice Department noted10 in their filing that that same lawyer kept them from going into the room to verify what she was representing in that certification. So it sure looks like an attempt to fool the investigators11, which I think is a main reason why the former president remains12 under criminal investigation.
INSKEEP: Now, I also have been reading the Trump lawyers' response last night. They contest the DOJ filing. They say, obviously, we have standing13 to complain here because it was a search of Trump's home. He has the right to complain about a search of his home. Does that give the Trump - does that give Trump standing, the right to demand an independent monitor, an independent judgment14 of what was taken?
MARIOTTI: So they have standing to complain. Trump has standing to complain about a search of his residence. But it's too early. It's not at the stage for him to be making Fourth Amendment15 argument or raising Fourth Amendment concerns. You know, regarding his request for a special master, I don't think the request in and of itself is out of bounds. But it's very bizarre. And it really doesn't appear to have any basis in fact here given the circumstances of this case.
INSKEEP: One other thing I want to ask about. It seems to me that the government has two choices to make here, one they've made. They decided16 to recover these documents. It seems to me it may be a separate decision whether to indict17 anybody, particularly a former president. How do you think that through as a prosecutor?
MARIOTTI: Well, great question. I think the starting point is whether or not there's sufficient evidence, OK? If the Justice Department concludes that they don't have sufficient evidence to prove guilt7 beyond a reasonable doubt - and I think, in the case of a former president, they would want to be absolutely certain that they could prove guilt. I think that they wouldn't move forward. Assuming that they have those - that evidence, I think they would consider other factors, whether there's a federal interest in the prosecution18 and, I think, some of the unique issues that come with prosecuting19 a former president.
INSKEEP: I wonder if you also have to consider, as Gerald Ford20 did with Richard Nixon, the political implications, the trauma21 for the country and whether that is worth the prosecution. Is it legitimate22 to think that part through that is explicitly23 political?
MARIOTTI: Well, I think that the Justice Department is going to make those considerations. I will say, it's so unprecedented24. It's the sort of consideration that is usually foreign to a prosecutor and the sort of thing that isn't considered by prosecutors25.
INSKEEP: Renato Mariotti, former federal prosecutor. Always a pleasure talking with you. Thank you so much.
MARIOTTI: Thank you.
1 prosecutor | |
n.起诉人;检察官,公诉人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 investigations | |
(正式的)调查( investigation的名词复数 ); 侦查; 科学研究; 学术研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 cocaine | |
n.可卡因,古柯碱(用作局部麻醉剂) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 guilt | |
n.犯罪;内疚;过失,罪责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 thwart | |
v.阻挠,妨碍,反对;adj.横(断的) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 investigators | |
n.调查者,审查者( investigator的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 standing | |
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 amendment | |
n.改正,修正,改善,修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 indict | |
v.起诉,控告,指控 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 prosecution | |
n.起诉,告发,检举,执行,经营 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 prosecuting | |
检举、告发某人( prosecute的现在分词 ); 对某人提起公诉; 继续从事(某事物); 担任控方律师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 Ford | |
n.浅滩,水浅可涉处;v.涉水,涉过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 trauma | |
n.外伤,精神创伤 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 legitimate | |
adj.合法的,合理的,合乎逻辑的;v.使合法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 explicitly | |
ad.明确地,显然地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 unprecedented | |
adj.无前例的,新奇的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 prosecutors | |
检举人( prosecutor的名词复数 ); 告发人; 起诉人; 公诉人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|