-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
A Texas judge rules coverage1 of anti-HIV medicine violates religious freedom
The judge in Texas ruled that a requirement for businesses to provide health insurance that covers HIV-preventative drugs violates the religious freedom of some Christian3 employers.
A MART?NEZ, HOST:
In Texas, a federal judge has ruled that businesses are not required to cover a medication that prevents HIV infection. That medication is best known as PrEP. Experts say this decision could also jeopardize4 access to many other preventative health services that the Affordable5 Care Act requires employers to cover. Sergio Martínez-Beltrán covers politics and government for the Texas Newsroom. Sergio, so tell us how this case got started.
SERGIO MART?NEZ-BELTR?N, BYLINE6: Sure. So this lawsuit7 was brought by a group of Christian business owners who claimed that requiring them to cover certain preventive services violated their religious freedoms. And those services include PrEP, the anti-HIV drug, contraceptives, drug addiction8 counseling and STD screening. One of those who sued the federal government is a Christian-operated corporation called Braidwood Management, which is owned by Texas Republican megadonor Steven Hotze. Hotze claimed the Affordable Care Act requirement that health plans cover PrEP would make his company, quote, "facilitate and encourage homosexual behavior." And so this federal judge in Texas, Reed O'Connor, sided with Hotze. In his ruling, the judge said that Hotze was able to prove that the PrEP mandate9 substantially burdens his religious freedoms.
MART?NEZ: So how did this ruling go over?
MART?NEZ-BELTR?N: I mean, I think it certainly created some waves yesterday when the decision came down. Judge O'Connor was appointed by President George W. Bush. He is a former aide to a Texas Republican senator, active in conservative circles. In 2018, for instance, he ruled that the Affordable Care Act was unconstitutional. However, the U.S. Supreme10 Court overturned his decision a few years later. And also, you know, the main attorney representing the plaintiffs is Jonathan Mitchell. He's the mastermind behind Texas anti-abortion11 law that empowers citizens to sue those who aid an abortion. So he's been somewhat successful with these types of lawsuits12 and laws. I don't think it was a surprise, you know? But it still moved many people because of the potential implications his decision could have not only for access to PrEP, but for all kinds of other health care services.
MART?NEZ: On those implications, tell us more about how other services or medications might be impacted.
MART?NEZ-BELTR?N: Well, the ruling took aim at a popular provision of the Affordable Care Act, which mandates13 free coverage of many preventive services, including birth control, breast cancer and heart disease screenings and vaccines14. And that's because Judge O'Connor also ruled that the panel of experts who help decide what preventive services needed to be covered by health insurers were actually appointed unconstitutionally. So this ruling could jeopardize many other types of health care, like cancer screenings, that people depend on. You know, in fact, the American Medical Association estimates that just in 2020, more than 151 million people received free preventive care because of this mandate in the ACA.
MART?NEZ: Then what does this mean for Americans who currently have these health care services covered?
MART?NEZ-BELTR?N: Unfortunately, we don't quite know yet. It's a broad ruling. The judge has yet to specify15 how his decision should be implemented16. You know, it's likely the federal government will appeal because of the potential impact on the lives of millions of Americans.
MART?NEZ: Sergio Martínez-Beltrán covers politics and government for the Texas Newsroom. Thanks a lot.
MART?NEZ-BELTR?N: Thanks for having me.
1 coverage | |
n.报导,保险范围,保险额,范围,覆盖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 jeopardize | |
vt.危及,损害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 affordable | |
adj.支付得起的,不太昂贵的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 lawsuit | |
n.诉讼,控诉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 addiction | |
n.上瘾入迷,嗜好 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 mandate | |
n.托管地;命令,指示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 abortion | |
n.流产,堕胎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 lawsuits | |
n.诉讼( lawsuit的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 mandates | |
托管(mandate的第三人称单数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 vaccines | |
疫苗,痘苗( vaccine的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 specify | |
vt.指定,详细说明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 implemented | |
v.实现( implement的过去式和过去分词 );执行;贯彻;使生效 | |
参考例句: |
|
|