-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Decoupling reliance on China has been a difficult to sell to U.S. business leaders
U.S.-China relations continue to sour. NPR's A Martinez talks to Yale University senior fellow Stephen Roach, who outlines a roadmap for relations with China in his book: Accidental Conflict.
A MART?NEZ, HOST:
Relations between the United States and China, the world's biggest economies, are at their worst in decades, but reducing American reliance on China has been a tough sell with some U.S. business leaders. During a visit to Shanghai this week, billionaire Tesla CEO Elon Musk2 said the interests of the two countries are, quote, "intertwined like conjoined twins." We turn now to Yale University's Stephen Roach. He outlines a new roadmap for this relationship in his book, "Accidental Conflict: America, China, And The Clash Of False Narratives3."
Stephen, I was looking at the art of the cover of your book, five pairs of red and blue arms intertwined. It kind of reminded me of Musk's quote, "intertwined like conjoined twins." Do you see any way for the U.S. to break its dependency on China economically?
STEPHEN ROACH: No, I don't. Without a trade war, a tech war and now a cold war possibly getting even hotter, I think that what's really missing here is an architecture for engagement, how we talk to the Chinese, how we deal with issues like trade, economics, innovation, human rights, climate, cyber, global health. We don't have an existing framework of engagement. And we need a new one, and I just wrote an article about that over the weekend.
MART?NEZ: If self-reliance then, Stephen, is a fantasy, how about less reliance on China?
ROACH: Well, we're trying to be cute here. We have given a new word to what pure self-reliance or decoupling would mean. We call it de-risking. But that's like your previous presenter4 just said, they renamed UFOs UAPs. It's the same concept. When you take a component5 that you used to get from China and you get it from Vietnam, that has decoupled that supply chain linkage6. Don't kid yourself and try to call it de-risking.
MART?NEZ: Does this go back to Richard Nixon's visit to China in 1972? I mean, it thawed7 relations. It opened up China to U.S. trade, but is that where all this kind of got its start?
ROACH: Well, that visit in 1972, Nixon and Kissinger, is the sort of the dawn of creation of the modern relationship. But ever since then, the relationship has been managed on a very personal basis between leaders. And that reflects, I think, a delicate interplay between personalities8, egos9, and domestic politics. We need a deeper, more institutionalized relationship, and my proposal tries to achieve that.
MART?NEZ: How much does China rely economically on the U.S. 'cause it seems like it's kind of on par10 with how much the U.S. relies on China?
ROACH: It's a two-way dependency or a codependency. China relies on us for our large and deep market of consumer demand. They're an export-led economy, and they need that. But we rely on them for the cheap goods they give us to make ends meet for consumers. They're a huge buyer of our treasuries11, and they're the third-largest and most rapidly growing U.S. export market. So we both need each other.
MART?NEZ: So considering we both need each other, as you say, Stephen, could that serve as a, say, deterrent12 for aggression13 either way?
ROACH: Well, it has historically. Economics and trade has long been the anchor of the U.S.-China relationship that has served the purpose of limiting confrontation14 in other areas. But now both countries and their leaders are more focused on security rather than economic and trade, and that is, you know, more of a worrisome, confrontational15 structure to their relationship.
MART?NEZ: You know, I mentioned Elon Musk's visit earlier. He's a high-profile name, so that visit was going to get a lot of attention. But when, say, high-profile brands such as the NBA - when the NBA invests billions of dollars in the Chinese market, does that give us more of a clue of how tough the U.S. can really get in opposing policies from China?
ROACH: Over the years, U.S. businesses have really recognized the dual16 benefits of investing in China. They get more efficient production, offshore17 production solutions from their offshoring, and they also get the opportunity to tap the world's richest and deepest market. But those advantages are now slipping away as we focus on security.
MART?NEZ: Stephen Roach is a senior fellow at Yale's Law School's China Center. Stephen, thanks.
ROACH: Thank you.
1 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 musk | |
n.麝香, 能发出麝香的各种各样的植物,香猫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 narratives | |
记叙文( narrative的名词复数 ); 故事; 叙述; 叙述部分 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 presenter | |
n.(电视、广播的)主持人,赠与者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 component | |
n.组成部分,成分,元件;adj.组成的,合成的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 linkage | |
n.连接;环节 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 thawed | |
解冻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 personalities | |
n. 诽谤,(对某人容貌、性格等所进行的)人身攻击; 人身攻击;人格, 个性, 名人( personality的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 egos | |
自我,自尊,自负( ego的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 par | |
n.标准,票面价值,平均数量;adj.票面的,平常的,标准的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 treasuries | |
n.(政府的)财政部( treasury的名词复数 );国库,金库 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 deterrent | |
n.阻碍物,制止物;adj.威慑的,遏制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 aggression | |
n.进攻,侵略,侵犯,侵害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 confrontation | |
n.对抗,对峙,冲突 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 confrontational | |
adj.挑衅的;对抗的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 dual | |
adj.双的;二重的,二元的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 offshore | |
adj.海面的,吹向海面的;adv.向海面 | |
参考例句: |
|
|