-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Grammar Girl here.
Today's topic is how to deal with electronic citations2.
Listener Question
Now to get started, here's a listener question:
Hi, Grammar Girl. My name is Laura and I am a teacher of 9th-grade English and a big fan of your podcast. I've used your podcast in my classroom and the Quick and Dirty Tips definitely come in handy. My question is how do I cite your podcast and podcasts in general? Do you know of a website that keeps really up to date on how to cite things, especially citing things from the Web?
Thanks, Laura. All three of the major style players, the Modern Language Association, the American Psychological Association, and The Chicago Manual of Style, have issued guidelines on how to cite electronic sources. I'm not aware of a specific website that lists examples of how to cite podcasts from all three sources together, but you can do a search on Google for something like "Chicago cite a podcast" and find examples for each style. Instead of telling you how to write citations, because it's kind of a visual thing, I'm putting examples in the transcript3 of this podcast. I’ll show you on the website how to cite a podcast and an article on a website in all three of the main formats5. So I guess now you could say that Grammar Girl is a good source on how to cite things!
But today I would like to talk about some other things related to citations.
Why Citations Are Important
First, people have asked me why it's important to include citations in the first place.
Aside from the fact that many teachers or editors require you to include citations in your work, including citations is necessary to acknowledge the people whose work you've incorporated into your document. Not including citations is a quick route to plagiarism6: more commonly known as taking credit for someone else's words or ideas (1). Including citations is mandatory7 when you've drawn8 on someone else's original work or quoted someone verbatim.
Even when citations aren't necessary to avoid plagiarism, including citations helps people who want to learn more about your topic. Citations are a great starting point for further research. And including citations adds credibility to your writing. Frankly9, I include citations at the end of most of my transcripts10 to head off people who disagree with my recommendations relating to points of style or topics where there are common misconceptions. I'm completely open to disagreement and discussion, but I don't just make this stuff up; I research every topic I cover. I'm almost always sorry when I don't include references on the website, and more than once I've gone back, reconstructed my work, and added them in.
Risks of Citing Electronic Sources
OK, so now that I've convinced you to include citations, it's time to think about the special risks of citing an electronic source like a website, podcast, or blog.
First, you have to determine whether it's a credible11 source, and second, you have to worry about whether it will still exist tomorrow.
Credibility
Determining whether a source is credible is subjective12, but here are a few things to look for and consider:
Can you tell who wrote the site? And if so, does the author seem to have any expertise13 in the area you are researching? The Stanford Cancer Center is likely to be a more credible source than Aunt Mary's Kancer Page.
Has the website been reviewed by experts? Does it bear a seal of approval or adhere to content standards? For example, health sites that want to boost their credibility adhere to standards set by the Health on the Net Foundation.
Can you tell when the page you are looking at was written? Something written recently is generally more credible than something that hasn't been updated in years.
Does the page cite other credible sources you can check? (There's that point about citations adding credibility again!)
Does it sound too good to be true? If it does, it probably is.
Is the site selling something based on the information it’s providing? If so, be wary14.
Do other credible sites link to the site? You can find out who links to a site by doing a specialized15 search on Google. Enter link:URL into the search box. For example, you could enter link:http://www.genetichealth.com (a website I helped launch) and learn that sites that link to it include a Japanese genome center, the Lance Armstrong Foundation, and a variety of hospitals.
Are there a lot of typos? If there are a lot of language mistakes, it can mean that there are a lot of factual mistakes, too.
Finally, use common sense and evaluate the arguments yourself. It's up to you to determine whether a site's conclusions are actually supported by its statements.
Permanence
You have control when you’re evaluating a site’s credibility, but you have less control over the fact that pages might disappear or change their Web address. If it's an important source, you should consider printing out the page or saving it on your own computer as HTML, a screenshot, or an audio or video file. If you find that a Web page is gone and you haven't had a chance to save it, you can search for a copy at the Internet Archive (also known as the Wayback Machine), at
Despite the risks, an abundance of credible information resides on the Web, and you shouldn't dismiss a source simply because it is in an electronic format4.
Finally, it's good style to use a consistent format for your references. You can go to the Grammar Girl section of QuickAndDirtyTips.com to see examples of citation styles from the Modern Language Association, American Psychological Association, and The Chicago Manual of Style.
Web Bonus
Citing a Web Page
[Note: There are different kinds of Web pages, and many require different formatting16. This example is for a Web article that is part of a larger website. Also, a quirk17 in our website requires us to shorten URLs. It is better to write out the original URL.]
American Psychological Association Style (2, 3)
Fogarty, M. (2006, October 14). Effect Versus18 Affect. Quick and Dirty Tips Website. Retrieved19 April 9, 2008, from
Chicago Manual of Style (2, 4)
Fogarty, Mignon. “Effect Versus Affect,” Quick and Dirty Tips Website, October 14, 2006, (accessed April 9, 2008).
Modern Language Association Style (2)
Fogarty, Mignon. “Effect Versus Affect.” Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing. 14 Oct. 2006. Quick and Dirty Tips Website. 9 Apr. 2008
Citing a Podcast
American Psychological Association Style (5, 6)
Fogarty, M. (Host) (2006, October 14). Effect Versus Affect [Podcast]. Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing. Gilbert, AZ: Quick and Dirty Tips Network. Retrieved April 9, 2008, from
Chicago Manual of Style (2, 4)
Fogarty, M. 2006. "Effect Versus Affect." Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing. Podcast audio program. Gilbert, AZ: Quick and Dirty Tips Network, October 14 (accessed April 9, 2008).
Modern Language Association Style (2, 7, 8, 9, 10)
[Note: I was unable to find a definitive20 source on citing a podcast in MLA style. My edition is old, and websites provided various recommendations, suggesting that the MLA may not have issued one guideline yet. What follows is my best-guess recommendation until I can find a definitive answer.]
Fogarty, Mignon. "Effect Versus Affect." Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing. 14 Oct. 2006. Quick and Dirty Tips Network. 9 Apr. 2008.
This week, three lucky listeners win a copy of Bonnie Trenga's book The Curious Case of the Misplaced Modifier: How to Solve the Mysteries of Weak Writing. Bonnie is my long-time copy editor, and this is a cute little grammar book that uses a solve-the-mystery format to make writing rules fun. The books are even signed! So if you're subscribed22 to our e-mail newsletter, check your inbox to see if you've won. For people who didn't win and are interested, I'll put a link to the book on the Grammar Girl website.
Questions and comments for me go to ...or the voicemail line at 206-338-GIRL. Also this week, the Get-It-Done Guy has a great episode about how to subversively23 lead a meeting even if you're not in charge, so check it out at QuickAndDirtyTips.com.
That's all. Thanks for listening.
1 citation | |
n.引用,引证,引用文;传票 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 citations | |
n.引用( citation的名词复数 );引证;引文;表扬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 format | |
n.设计,版式;[计算机]格式,DOS命令:格式化(磁盘),用于空盘或使用过的磁盘建立新空盘来存储数据;v.使格式化,设计,安排 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 formats | |
n.(出版物的)版式( format的名词复数 );[电视]电视节目的总安排(或计划) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 plagiarism | |
n.剽窃,抄袭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 mandatory | |
adj.命令的;强制的;义务的;n.受托者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 frankly | |
adv.坦白地,直率地;坦率地说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 transcripts | |
n.抄本( transcript的名词复数 );转写本;文字本;副本 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 credible | |
adj.可信任的,可靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 subjective | |
a.主观(上)的,个人的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 expertise | |
n.专门知识(或技能等),专长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 wary | |
adj.谨慎的,机警的,小心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 specialized | |
adj.专门的,专业化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 formatting | |
n.格式化v.使格式化( format的现在分词 );规定…的格式(或形状、大小、比例等);安排…的格局(或规格);设计…的版面 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 quirk | |
n.奇事,巧合;古怪的举动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 versus | |
prep.以…为对手,对;与…相比之下 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 retrieved | |
v.取回( retrieve的过去式和过去分词 );恢复;寻回;检索(储存的信息) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 definitive | |
adj.确切的,权威性的;最后的,决定性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 administrative | |
adj.行政的,管理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 subscribed | |
v.捐助( subscribe的过去式和过去分词 );签署,题词;订阅;同意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 subversively | |
颠覆性的,破坏性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|