-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Well, it now seems that the race for the Republican nomination1, which once had more candidates than a baseball team, is down to three real contenders.
The Democrats2 are down to two, and something suddenly occurred to me over the weekend. I'm a baby boomer, born in the 1950s.
That was a proud decade. Besides all the millions and millions of us, it gave America rock and roll, tail fins3, and color TV. Growing up, we were going to change the world and make it a better place when one of us got to be president.
Except now it seems that none of us may ever get the chance. It may well be that no child born in the 1950s will ever become president of the United States. Consider this:
The two remaining Democratic candidates, Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton, were born in the 1940s. So was Donald Trump5. Ted4 Cruz and Marco Rubio, the only others with a realistic shot at the Republican nomination, were born in the 1970s, which still boggles my mind.
It was bad enough that President Obama was born in 1961. Ohio Governor John Kasich was born in 1953, and he is still hanging in there. But he got a bare seven percent of the vote in South Carolina. Fewer votes, that is, than Jeb Bush, who then quit. At this point, vice6-president seems a far more reasonable goal for Kasich. Ben Carson is no longer a real factor.
So suppose one of the five front-runners does win. The last three presidents served their full two terms. Assuming the next one does too, the children of my decade will be somewhere between 66 and 75 when the next president leaves office.
Theoretically one of us could still be elected in 2024. But that's not very likely; new stars keep emerging, and old ones get eclipsed. If that happens, the 1950s will join the 1930s as the only two decades since 1820 that never produced a president.
I can understand why not the 30s: Fewer babies were born because of The Great Depression. And two 30s babies did become major party nominees8, Mike Dukakis and John McCain, both of whom lost badly. The nearly 40 million of us born in the 1950s have yet to produce even one vice presidential nominee7.
I'm not quite sure why.
It could be that the slightly older boomers, like Clinton and Trump, got out there first and won't leave, which is what has been happening all across America.
It could be because we were the most indulged generation in history, spoiled by parents trying to compensate9 for their own deprivations10 in the Great Depression and World War II.
And frankly11, I indeed can't recall any politicians my age who were as relentlessly12 driven, say, as are the Clintons. Our parents probably would have said our powers of concentration and drive were weakened by all that Beatles music. Or that we lost our faith in politics because of Watergate or Vietnam. There may something to all that.
Except that when you consider what someone running for president has to go through, it might just be that a lot of us looked at it—and decided13 that we are just a little bit too sane14.
Jack15 Lessenberry is Michigan Radio's political analyst16. Views expressed in his essays are his own and do not necessarily reflect those of Michigan Radio, its management or the station licensee, The University of Michigan.
1 nomination | |
n.提名,任命,提名权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 fins | |
[医]散热片;鱼鳍;飞边;鸭掌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 ted | |
vt.翻晒,撒,撒开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 vice | |
n.坏事;恶习;[pl.]台钳,老虎钳;adj.副的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 nominee | |
n.被提名者;被任命者;被推荐者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 nominees | |
n.被提名者,被任命者( nominee的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 compensate | |
vt.补偿,赔偿;酬报 vi.弥补;补偿;抵消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 deprivations | |
剥夺( deprivation的名词复数 ); 被夺去; 缺乏; 匮乏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 frankly | |
adv.坦白地,直率地;坦率地说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 relentlessly | |
adv.不屈不挠地;残酷地;不间断 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 sane | |
adj.心智健全的,神志清醒的,明智的,稳健的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 jack | |
n.插座,千斤顶,男人;v.抬起,提醒,扛举;n.(Jake)杰克 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 analyst | |
n.分析家,化验员;心理分析学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|