-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Joan Larsen faces a tangled1 path to a plum spot on a federal appeals court. The only thing standing2 in her way is Michigan’s two U.S. Senators.
Joan Larsen is a Michigan Supreme3 Court justice. She was appointed by Governor Rick Snyder.
She’s popular with Michigan Republicans and Democrats4 and she’s recently been nominated by President Trump5 to the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.
It’s a court that has made some big decisions like in 2014 when it ruled on Michigan’s same-sex marriage ban.
It was the only federal appeals court in the country to uphold a state ban on same-sex marriage. That decision famously sent the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Larsen was on President Trump’s list of possible U.S. Supreme Court nominees7 when he was candidate Trump. So, this nomination8 is no surprise.
But, the position must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate where there is a courtesy known as the “blue slip.” The tradition dates back at least 100 years and it allows senators from a nominee6’s home state to give a ‘yea’ or a ‘nay’ on the nominee.
Michigan’s two Democratic U.S. senators - Debbie Stabenow and Gary Peters - have done neither. They have yet to return their blue slips on Joan Larsen.
And that is holding up the Senate confirmation9 process.
It has become a political issue. A conservative group called the Judicial10 Crisis Network has spent at least $140,000 on an ad that calls the delay “partisan11 politics.”
And, maybe it is partisan politics. But, it’s not new.
Just last year in fact, in the Sixth Circuit, President Obama nominated a state Supreme Court Justice from Kentucky. And, guess what? Both Republican Senators from that state - Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul - held on to their ‘blue slips.’
It wasn’t until President Trump was sworn in and nominated a different candidate that they turned in the slips. So, are we seeing a little payback here?
The ‘blue slip’ is the minority party’s only card since Senate Democrats ended the option of filibustering12 lower court nominations13.
So now, Michigan Senators Stabenow and Peters seem to be compiling their own list of potential federal court nominees. A recent joint14 release invites people to “apply” through their offices to fill vacancies15 on federal courts here in Michigan.
Next move, Republicans?
There’s talk the Senate committee chair could simply ignore the ‘blue slip’ process and allow the nomination to go forward. It’s a tradition, not a law. But, it would be a big deal to suddenly change a Senate courtesy after a century.
Trump could also withdraw the Larsen nomination and name someone from a state in the Sixth Circuit with Republican senators. Tennessee and Kentucky both fit that bill.
It’s a game of political chicken. We’ll see how far it goes.
1 tangled | |
adj. 纠缠的,紊乱的 动词tangle的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 standing | |
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 nominee | |
n.被提名者;被任命者;被推荐者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 nominees | |
n.被提名者,被任命者( nominee的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 nomination | |
n.提名,任命,提名权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 confirmation | |
n.证实,确认,批准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 judicial | |
adj.司法的,法庭的,审判的,明断的,公正的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 filibustering | |
v.阻碍或延宕国会或其他立法机构通过提案( filibuster的现在分词 );掠夺 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 nominations | |
n.提名,任命( nomination的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 joint | |
adj.联合的,共同的;n.关节,接合处;v.连接,贴合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 vacancies | |
n.空房间( vacancy的名词复数 );空虚;空白;空缺 | |
参考例句: |
|
|