-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
The founders1 of our system attempted to give this country, and later this state, something called representative democracy.
That’s supposed to mean electing people we trust to represent our best interests to make laws for the state and nation. That generally worked pretty well. Not that it was perfect, and for a long time some of us were shut out of participating. But eventually that got fixed2.
Unfortunately, in recent years, the system has become badly broken. Term limits have been a disaster. But what may be even worse is the rise of extreme gerrymandering. That means, jiggering the district lines in such a way as to give one party complete dominance.
That’s what’s happened in this state. Though Michigan usually votes Democratic in national elections, Republicans have been in control of most or all branches of state government the last several times new lines have been drawn3.
Rather than keep communities together, they’ve drawn the lines to give themselves maximum partisan4 advantage. As a result, we have elections in which Democrats5 win a majority of the statewide vote for legislature or Congress, but end up with only a minority of the seats.
Worse, most districts are drawn in a way to make them completely uncompetitive in a general election, no matter what. That’s why Brian Banks, a known criminal, could be elected despite a long string of felonies.
Community interests are also ignored.
Kalamazoo and Battle Creek6, which rightly were in the same congressional district for decades, are no longer. Rural Oakland County voters are combined with the Grosse Pointes and some of the roughest and poorest inner-city neighborhoods.
Requiring a fair way to draw district lines is essential if we are ever to make democracy work again.
Members of a non-partisan, non-profit group called Voters Not Politicians has been working for months to find out what voters want, and how to draw up a state constitutional amendment7 to give it to them. They’ve come up with a workable plan for a fair and bipartisan commission that would draw the boundaries.
Finally, they submitted petition language to the Board of State Canvassers on June 28, so they could start collecting the more than 315,000 signatures they’d need to get it on next year’s ballot8.
But the board still hasn’t acted.
And Voters Not Politicians is complaining they are losing valuable time. I wasn’t surprised at the delay when I heard that the petition they submitted was eight pages long, in tiny type.
But Walt Sorg, one of their guiding spirits, explained. “The document is really long because (under state law) we are required to include all current language that is either repealed9 or abrogated10 by our amendment.”
Sorg, a longtime, experienced Lansing hand who has worked in all three branches of state government did say that if it gets on the ballot, voters will fortunately see only a one hundred word summary. It makes sense to make sure the language is right; Lieutenant11 Governor Brian Calley had to throw out a bunch of signatures after his petition drive went off half-cocked.
But I am hoping that Voters Not Politicians can get their amendment before the people as soon as possible. The future of both representative, and responsible, government may be at stake.
1 founders | |
n.创始人( founder的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 creek | |
n.小溪,小河,小湾 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 amendment | |
n.改正,修正,改善,修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 ballot | |
n.(不记名)投票,投票总数,投票权;vi.投票 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 repealed | |
撤销,废除( repeal的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 abrogated | |
废除(法律等)( abrogate的过去式和过去分词 ); 取消; 去掉; 抛开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 lieutenant | |
n.陆军中尉,海军上尉;代理官员,副职官员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|