-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
DAVID GREENE, HOST:
The 2016 presidential election was so much more than just a political race for Tom Forman.
TOM FORMAN: It was the best reality TV show. Who knew how it was going to end? Constant elimination1 - a big field that got narrowed over the course of the campaign. And just when you thought it couldn't get any weirder2 and crazier, somehow, it seems to. Like, those were teases I couldn't have written if I tried.
GREENE: Forman is the CEO of the production company Critical Content. He produces reality TV. Forman has brought us hits like "Extreme Makeover: Home Edition" and also the controversial show "Kid Nation." And as we look back on a week featuring the season finale of Supreme3 Court Nominee4 Survivor5...
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP6: So was that a surprise? Was it?
GREENE: ...And also The National Prayer Breakfast: Apprentice7 Edition...
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
TRUMP: I want to just pray for Arnold, if we can, for those ratings, OK?
GREENE: ...We wanted to ask Forman whether some of this political theater is coming straight out of the reality-TV playbook.
FORMAN: He uses tools we use every day to tell and shape a story.
GREENE: Yeah? Like what?
FORMAN: Conflict and drama, right?
GREENE: OK.
FORMAN: That is still the engine that powers all reality television. I guess I would note that, candidly8, reality television does not typically address giant, macro issues particularly well, right? It's not a genre9 of big ideas. And that's OK.
GREENE: You're not going to take on the relationship with Iran in a reality, taped TV show.
FORMAN: Right. What it does do really well is interpersonal relationships - is taking big themes like love and jealousy10 and revenge and boiling them down to conversations between two people.
GREENE: I'm just thinking about Mitt11 Romney and the whole dinner that he and Trump had and the glass of wine...
FORMAN: Right. Well, look. So...
GREENE: ...And the date to see if he was going to be secretary of state.
FORMAN: That's exactly right. And I think Trump clearly knows that those small interactions that speak to larger themes are what connects with us as humans. And I think it's probably something that we should know, too, as we consume his tweets, as we watch White House press conferences or prayer breakfasts - you know, that this is a guy who understands how to make us feel a certain way.
He's the anti-wonk. You know, it's not operating at 30,000 feet. But neither would one of my sometimes-dumb reality shows. You know, this is a visceral, red-meat story that we can sort of dig our teeth into. So I'm not surprised people do.
GREENE: What role is the media playing in making this all feel like reality TV?
FORMAN: Look, the media loves a good story, right? I think he knows the degree to which we like a simple story told well and is doing his best to give us one. I mean, look. I think Obama, smart though he was - an unbelievably talented speaker - you know, was operating at that 30,000-foot level. He wanted to talk about policy. Obama would talk about the relationship between the federal government and state-funded education, you know, and the federal government's role in helping12 people at a state level go out and get a college education. And that's unbelievably important. But it's dry.
GREENE: You're suggesting people fall asleep at that moment in the speech.
FORMAN: Yeah. Trump tweets about withdrawing federal funding, you know, in the wake of a protest. And, suddenly, you're impassioned, and you have a point of view. And he's hooked you. What he's actually talking about is nuts and certainly less important than the actual policy discussion. But he's made it understandable. He's made it personal. He's added a conflict-driven narrative13. And, look, those are the techniques we use every day because they work.
GREENE: Under the model you're talking about, it seems like if he says that - says something that's kind of outrageous14 - it grabs attention and might stir a debate about an issue that is important and would be important to presidents like Obama - but that he wouldn't have been able to stir things that well.
FORMAN: I think that's right. But we think about that a lot in our business. You don't want to get bogged15 down in an argument over facts when you make a reality television show. You don't want to convey a ton of information because people get bored or lost or change the channel. And that's certainly not our business.
You want to be directionally correct. You want to amplify16 what your viewers already believe to be true, what they know in their bones. And that means keeping the conversation at a pretty red-meat level. It's stuff I can grasp quickly, talk about at the dinner table. I think Trump just sort of gets that.
GREENE: What do you say to someone who says that they like directionally correct, maybe, in reality TV, but they want more commitment to facts from the president of the United States?
FORMAN: You know, look. My gut17 is you're hearing that from journalists. I don't know that you're hearing that from real people out in the United States, who, I think, on some level, don't really care. You know - and that some of the disconnect between the news media and their viewers, readers, consumers today is that they don't hold Trump to the same standards that reporters do.
GREENE: Are you OK as an American and as a voter with that standard used in reality TV being applied18 to the White House?
FORMAN: Look, I find it terribly frustrating19. I was a journalist in a previous life. So I know exactly what it must be like to stand in a briefing room and wonder if what you're being told is true. I guess, on some platonic20 level, I, too, have an objection. But who cares? You know, he's doing it, and he's going to continue doing it.
But I do think it's sort of incumbent21 upon us as voters to arm ourselves and to deconstruct the narrative coming from the White House or anywhere. You know, you have to be an informed consumer of messages. But, like, that's on us. He's going to tell a story. He's really good at it. And you're not going to stop him. You've just got to learn to read it right.
GREENE: Tom Forman, thanks so much for coming by. We appreciate it.
FORMAN: Sure. Thank you.
(SOUNDBITE OF MIEUX COMPOSITION, "RUST")
GREENE: Tom Forman, reality TV producer - he's the CEO of Critical Content, a production company in LA. And he came by to visit our studios here at NPR West.
STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
Now, since they talked about the National Prayer Breakfast, let's add a bit of news here. David, you'll be interested in this. Besides using the event to joke about Arnold Schwarzenegger, the president used the traditionally nonpartisan moment to make a political pledge. He said he would totally destroy the Johnson Amendment22, which is a law that, since the 1950s, has prevented churches and other tax-exempt religious groups from spending money on politics.
He did pledge to do this during his campaign. It's a move that is supported by many of his backers, including Jerry Falwell Jr., although critics have said it blurs23 the line between church and state. So there's another conflict set up for the weeks, months and years ahead.
GREENE: Indeed.
1 elimination | |
n.排除,消除,消灭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 weirder | |
怪诞的( weird的比较级 ); 神秘而可怕的; 超然的; 古怪的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 nominee | |
n.被提名者;被任命者;被推荐者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 survivor | |
n.生存者,残存者,幸存者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 apprentice | |
n.学徒,徒弟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 candidly | |
adv.坦率地,直率而诚恳地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 genre | |
n.(文学、艺术等的)类型,体裁,风格 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 jealousy | |
n.妒忌,嫉妒,猜忌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 mitt | |
n.棒球手套,拳击手套,无指手套;vt.铐住,握手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 helping | |
n.食物的一份&adj.帮助人的,辅助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 narrative | |
n.叙述,故事;adj.叙事的,故事体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 outrageous | |
adj.无理的,令人不能容忍的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 bogged | |
adj.陷于泥沼的v.(使)陷入泥沼, (使)陷入困境( bog的过去式和过去分词 );妨碍,阻碍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 amplify | |
vt.放大,增强;详述,详加解说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 gut | |
n.[pl.]胆量;内脏;adj.本能的;vt.取出内脏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 applied | |
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 frustrating | |
adj.产生挫折的,使人沮丧的,令人泄气的v.使不成功( frustrate的现在分词 );挫败;使受挫折;令人沮丧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 platonic | |
adj.精神的;柏拉图(哲学)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 incumbent | |
adj.成为责任的,有义务的;现任的,在职的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 amendment | |
n.改正,修正,改善,修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 blurs | |
n.模糊( blur的名词复数 );模糊之物;(移动的)模糊形状;模糊的记忆v.(使)变模糊( blur的第三人称单数 );(使)难以区分 | |
参考例句: |
|
|