-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
DAVID GREENE, HOST:
The huge crowds that came to Washington, D.C., last month for the Women's March have spawned1 a renewed interest in marching on our nation's capital. A variety of marches are in the works, including a March for Science. As NPR's Nell Greenfieldboyce reports, scientists seem split on whether taking to the streets for science is really a good idea.
NELL GREENFIELDBOYCE, BYLINE2: Jacquelyn Gill is a paleoecologist at the University of Maine. She says right after the inauguration3 and the Women's March, she went on Twitter and said, hey, we need a march for science.
JACQUELYN GILL: And someone else said, yeah, that's a great idea. And then someone else said, yeah, I had the same thought. And so then we all kind of glommed together and started working on it.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: Gill says there's a lot of concern about the fate of science under President Trump4. His appointees include climate change skeptics. He's met with an anti-vaccination campaigner. He regularly cites false numbers on things like voter fraud and crime rates, while his surrogates defend the use of, quote, "alternative facts." Gill says the march will take a stand for the importance of public policies based on evidence.
GILL: Our goal, really, is to bring people together in a strong unifying5 message that science is important to our citizens. It's important to our nation. And that we are going to hold our elected representatives accountable to that.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: The march now has a website and a Facebook page that's gotten the attention of hundreds of thousands of people. Sister marches are planned from Cleveland to Anchorage. The organizers describe it as a nonpartisan celebration of science, but not everyone buys that. Jerry Coyne is a biologist at the University of Chicago. He says the only thing that binds7 scientists together is that they all use the same tools - hypothesis-driven experiments, replication of results, peer review. How are you going to stick that on a protest sign?
JERRY COYNE: A march for science itself is just simply a march for the mechanisms8 that find truth. And who's going to pay attention to that?
GREENFIELDBOYCE: He says what will get attention is the politics.
COYNE: It's going to become a partisan6 march.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: And that is what worries some scientists who do research on hot-button issues, like Rob Young, a coastal9 geologist10 at Western Carolina University. He opposes the march.
ROB YOUNG: I'm not saying that we don't have a problem with ensuring that science has a seat at the table when we're making decisions at all levels of government. But this march is not going to make that job any easier.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: He works on sea level rise, a reality that some politicians would rather ignore. He thinks it's best for scientists to interact one-on-one with decision makers11 across the political spectrum12, and says all a march will do is make scientists seem like just another biased13 interest group. He hates that the march will happen on April 22, which is Earth Day.
YOUNG: Those folks who have been trying to pigeonhole14 and demonize scientists as having a particular political view and identity will see scientists marching on Earth Day as a part of the environmental movement.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: But others say, look, if some protest signs at this march are overtly15 political or even inflammatory, that's OK. Michael Eisen is a biologist at the University of California, Berkeley. He says scientists, who are used to controlled lab experiments, just have to get comfortable with the rough and tumble of public life.
MICHAEL EISEN: You just can't hope for perfect control over what a large group of people do when they get up to express themselves.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: He thinks science is under threat, and that it's time for scientists to show they really care about how science gets used.
EISEN: You can't be completely blind to the fact that the current administration has a fairly dim of science in some areas.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: That's one reason why he's not just going to march. He's going to run for the U.S. Senate. Nell Greenfieldboyce, NPR News.
1 spawned | |
(鱼、蛙等)大量产(卵)( spawn的过去式和过去分词 ); 大量生产 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 inauguration | |
n.开幕、就职典礼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 unifying | |
使联合( unify的现在分词 ); 使相同; 使一致; 统一 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 binds | |
v.约束( bind的第三人称单数 );装订;捆绑;(用长布条)缠绕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 mechanisms | |
n.机械( mechanism的名词复数 );机械装置;[生物学] 机制;机械作用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 coastal | |
adj.海岸的,沿海的,沿岸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 geologist | |
n.地质学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 makers | |
n.制造者,制造商(maker的复数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 spectrum | |
n.谱,光谱,频谱;范围,幅度,系列 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 biased | |
a.有偏见的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 pigeonhole | |
n.鸽舍出入口;v.把...归类 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 overtly | |
ad.公开地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|