-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:
And for more on the Trump1 administration's reaction to the chemical weapons attack in Syria, we're joined now by NPR White House correspondent Tamara Keith. Hi, Tam.
SIEGEL: What has President Trump actually said about this?
KEITH: Well, earlier today, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer, as we just heard, described the attack as heinous3. He was actually reading a statement from President Trump that was later released in text form. And I want you to just hear a little bit more of Spicer reading from that statement.
(SOUNDBITE OF PRESS CONFERENCE)
SEAN SPICER: (Reading) These heinous actions by the Bashar al-Assad regime are a consequence of the past administration's weakness and irresolution4. President Obama said in 2012 that he would establish a, quote, unquote, "red line" against the use of chemical weapons and then did nothing.
KEITH: The statement blames President Obama, but it doesn't actually say how Trump plans to respond to this attack or what his administration's posture5 is toward Assad.
SIEGEL: Well, apart from the statement, is there any indication of where the Trump administration is headed on this or what the plan is?
KEITH: Well, so one thing to know about President Trump - and this goes back well before he was the president, even before he was a candidate - is that he doesn't like politicians, political leaders telegraphing where they might be going on military matters.
So as a candidate, he said that he had a plan for defeating ISIS, but he wouldn't say what it was because he didn't want to tip them off. His critics said then and now that Trump didn't have a plan for ISIS and that he doesn't have one for dealing6 with Assad on Syria - in Syria.
What Press Secretary Sean Spicer says is that the president's statement speaks for itself and that he is meeting with his national security team. He's alarmed about what's happening and that there will be further discussions with allies about the appropriate next action. But he simply said he was not ready to talk about next steps, but they will, quote, "get there soon."
SIEGEL: Tam, before this latest development, there were mixed messages coming from top Trump administration officials about Assad, and I'm thinking of the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., Nikki Haley, who described the Syrian leader as a war criminal. What is the administration's position?
KEITH: Yeah, there's been something of a back and forth7 on this recently. First Haley said that the U.S. priority was no longer to sit there and focus on getting Assad out. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson essentially8 said the same thing, that the Syrian people themselves should decide what happens with Assad.
But then - you're right - Nikki Haley on Monday said the administration has no love for Assad. She called him a war criminal and a hindrance9 to peace. Spicer says the administration's view is consistent, that there is not an option of regime change as there has been in the past.
SIEGEL: I want to go back to the president's statement criticizing President Obama and the red line that Obama drew in 2012 with regard to chemical weapons. Donald Trump has left a long Twitter trail in his wake, and Twitter presents a window into the mind of the private citizen Donald Trump. I gather you've been looking back at what he was saying then. What did you find?
KEITH: Yeah, so there are a lot of tweets about this, none from 2012 when President Obama first used the term red line. But then later in 2013 when the U.S. was thinking about a military strike in Syria to send a message about chemical weapons, Trump tweeted, quote, "President Obama, do not attack Syria; there is no upside and tremendous downside. Save your powder for another and more important day."
He around the same time also tweeted, President Obama put himself in a very bad position when he talked about Syria crossing a red line; amazingly, now he denies that. So Trump all along has been very focused on President Obama's response and at times said that he looked weak.
SIEGEL: That's NPR White House correspondent Tamara Keith. Tam, thanks.
KEITH: You're welcome.
1 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 heinous | |
adj.可憎的,十恶不赦的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 irresolution | |
n.不决断,优柔寡断,犹豫不定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 posture | |
n.姿势,姿态,心态,态度;v.作出某种姿势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 dealing | |
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 hindrance | |
n.妨碍,障碍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|