-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Justice Department Sues California Over Impeding1 Immigration Enforcement
MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:
Late-breaking news out of California tonight - the U.S. Justice Department is suing the state and its top officials. The federal government says California is interfering2 with federal immigration enforcement and violating the Constitution. Here with me to talk about the case is NPR justice correspondent Carrie Johnson. Hey, Carrie.
CARRIE JOHNSON, BYLINE3: Hey there.
KELLY: So no secret that Trump4 administration officials and California officials have been at odds5. What is this latest lawsuit6 about?
JOHNSON: The U.S. Justice Department is targeting three laws that California passed last year, in essence calling them a brazen7 interference with the federal government's sweeping8 power over immigration issues. One state law bars employers from voluntarily cooperating with federal immigration agents and forces them to notify employees in advance about any immigration raids. Another law covers state and local law enforcement. It says they're not able to volunteer information to the Department of Homeland Security or ICE agents about release dates of undocumented immigrants in their custody9. And the third law covers state inspections10 of those federal centers where detainees are held. The U.S. Justice Department says all three of those laws are an impermissible burden on federal authority.
KELLY: Well, what are the odds that the Justice Department will prevail here? I mean, fair to say that the Trump administration has a mixed record so far in federal court.
JOHNSON: Very much a mixed record, but the odds here may be pretty good. It's true the feds have a lot of power when it comes to immigration. An irony11 alert - the Trump Justice Department is using a precedent12 from the Obama administration (laughter) here.
KELLY: Aha, it all comes around.
JOHNSON: Yeah, it does. They're talking about a Supreme13 Court case from several years ago where the Obama Justice Department sued Arizona over some very punitive14 immigration laws that Arizona had passed. A divided Supreme Court voted 5 to 3 to invalidate some big parts of that Arizona law on the grounds that the federal government has supremacy15 here, that the feds trump state law. And the reasoning is that you can't have each state setting its own immigration policy. It's just unworkable.
KELLY: Well, and back to this case, which is the latest in a series of skirmishes really between California and Washington, specifically on immigration, I mean, what's the backdrop here?
JOHNSON: Yeah, the attorney general of California, Xavier Becerra, is already fighting with the attorney general of the United States, Jeff Sessions, over the Justice Department's threat to deny California access to federal law enforcement grants. The Justice Department says if you don't comply with federal law on immigration and share information about detainees, you shouldn't get law enforcement money from the federal government. And recently, Mary Louise, the mayor in Oakland, Calif., issued a warning to the immigrant community there that the feds were planning a big raid. That really angered the Department of Homeland Security, did not go over well at the Justice Department or the White House either.
KELLY: What about Attorney General Jeff Sessions? What kind of role is he playing in this case?
JOHNSON: Attorney General Jeff Sessions is no fan of immigration measures that allow more people to come to the U.S.
KELLY: Right.
JOHNSON: In fact, in the Senate, he was one of the biggest foes16 of immigration that existed back then. He's going to Sacramento on Wednesday to speak with a law enforcement group there. He's going to pledge to fight what he calls unjust, unfair and unconstitutional policies. Also speaking at that law enforcement conference is the attorney general of California, Xavier Becerra, who's no shrinking violet. So expect some big fireworks tomorrow.
KELLY: Carrie, thank you.
JOHNSON: My pleasure.
KELLY: That's NPR justice correspondent Carrie Johnson talking about this late-breaking news out of California. The Justice Department is suing the state and its top officials tonight.
1 impeding | |
a.(尤指坏事)即将发生的,临近的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 interfering | |
adj. 妨碍的 动词interfere的现在分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 odds | |
n.让步,机率,可能性,比率;胜败优劣之别 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 lawsuit | |
n.诉讼,控诉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 brazen | |
adj.厚脸皮的,无耻的,坚硬的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 sweeping | |
adj.范围广大的,一扫无遗的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 custody | |
n.监护,照看,羁押,拘留 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 inspections | |
n.检查( inspection的名词复数 );检验;视察;检阅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 irony | |
n.反语,冷嘲;具有讽刺意味的事,嘲弄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 precedent | |
n.先例,前例;惯例;adj.在前的,在先的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 punitive | |
adj.惩罚的,刑罚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 supremacy | |
n.至上;至高权力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 foes | |
敌人,仇敌( foe的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|