-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
AS IT IS 2015-10-06 US Promises to Investigate Afghan Hospital Attack 美国军方承认为阿富汗医院轰炸事件负责
The United States military is promising1 to investigate whether it targeted a hospital in northern Afghanistan.
The medical aid group Doctors Without Borders says at least 22 people died in airstrikes on the hospital. The group, also known as MSF, operates the medical center in the city of Kunduz.
U.S. Defense2 Secretary Ash Carter has called the attack Saturday a tragic3 loss of life. He promised a full and open investigation4 of the incident.
Secretary Carter admitted that U.S. planes were supporting Afghan military operations near Kunduz when the hospital was hit. Mr. Carter said he would hold “anybody responsible for doing something they shouldn’t have done.” He said there are questions about what happened and that it might take some time to gather information about the attack. He has ordered U.S. forces to provide any medical aid needed in the area.
Some U.S. officials spoke5 on condition that they not be identified in news reports. They said that U.S. special operations troops were helping6 Afghan forces. Those forces reportedly had been attacked and asked for help from warplanes. Afghan officials say their forces came under attack from Taliban fighters operating in the hospital or on its grounds.
After the attack, Doctors Without Borders said it had withdrawn7 from Kunduz. It added that more than 180 medical workers and patients were in the hospital at the time of the airstrikes.
The group released a statement on Sunday. It called for an independent investigation of the attack. The group expressed disgust at statements from Afghan officials suggesting that Afghan and U.S. forces decided8 to destroy “a fully9 functioning hospital because they claim that members of the Taliban were present.”
Doctors Without Borders said the statements represent an admission of a war crime.
The group also said that none of its workers reported any fighting in or near the hospital before the suspected U.S. air strike. And it said, “in any case, bombing a fully functional10 hospital can never be justified11.”
It said the hospital was repeatedly hit, but nearby buildings were not damaged. The group also said the airstrikes continued for 30 minutes after U.S. and Afghan military officials in Kabul and Washington were first informed of the raids.
Doctors Without Borders said it told the coalition12, Afghan military and civilian13 officials about the hospital last week in an attempt to prevent it from being targeted.
The Taliban sent a statement to VOA denying that its fighters were in the hospital when the building was attacked.
United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and U.N. human rights chief Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein called the airstrike “inexcusable.”
The rights chief said that, “international and Afghan military planners have an obligation to respect and protect civilians14 at all times, and medical facilities and personnel are the object(s) of a special protection. If established as deliberate in a court of law, an airstrike on a hospital may amount to a war crime.”
Jonah Blank is a South Asia expert with the RAND Corporation research group. He praised the work of Doctors Without Borders. And he said we should wait for the results of the investigation.
Mr. Blank noted15 that now that the NATO-led combat mission in Afghanistan has ended, Afghan forces often ask for support from warplanes. And he said the presence of the U.S. special forces shows that Afghan forces are unable to force Taliban fighters from Kunduz by themselves.
About 9,800 American troops are now in Afghanistan. The U.S. military had planned to reduce that number to 1,000 by the end of 2016. But some reports say U.S. defense officials are worried about the security situation in Afghanistan and may want to keep a few thousand troops in the country after 2016.
Words in This Story
disgust – n. a strong feeling or dislike for something
functioning – adj. operating; working
facilities – n. buildings or equipment made for a special purpose
personnel – n. workers; employees
deliberate – adj. done in a way that is planned
1 promising | |
adj.有希望的,有前途的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 tragic | |
adj.悲剧的,悲剧性的,悲惨的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 helping | |
n.食物的一份&adj.帮助人的,辅助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 withdrawn | |
vt.收回;使退出;vi.撤退,退出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 functional | |
adj.为实用而设计的,具备功能的,起作用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 justified | |
a.正当的,有理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 coalition | |
n.结合体,同盟,结合,联合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 civilian | |
adj.平民的,民用的,民众的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 civilians | |
平民,百姓( civilian的名词复数 ); 老百姓 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|