-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
US Military Experts Propose Sharing Nuclear Arms with Japan, South Korea
A group of military experts is proposing that the United States share its nuclear weapons with Japan and South Korea to answer the nuclear threat from North Korea.
The experts’ comments appear in Joint1 Forces Quarterly, a publication of the National Defense2 University. It notes that the opinions expressed in the article are not the official policy or position of the U.S. government.
In talks with U.S. officials, North Korea agreed not to test nuclear arms and long-range missiles. Yet the country apparently3 launched short-range missiles on Wednesday.
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has met three times with U.S. President Donald Trump4. Their most recent meeting took place in June in Panmunjom, along the border between North and South Korea.
But the North has been slow to get involved in talks aimed at working out details of ending its nuclear weapons program. The U.S. government has offered to lift economic restrictions5 on the country once the program is suspended.
Experts: US should consider sharing
The four military experts expressed their opinions in an article called “Twenty-first Century Nuclear Deterrence7.” The four serve in the U.S. army, navy and air force.
They wrote that: “The United States should strongly consider…sharing of nonstrategic nuclear capabilities8 during times of crisis with select Asia-Pacific partners, specifically Japan and the Republic of Korea.”
The Republic of Korea is the official name for South Korea. The term nonstrategic mainly describes weapons, like bombs, that can be dropped from warplanes.
The idea of the U.S. sharing nuclear arms with Japan and South Korea would involve deploying10 the weapons to the countries so they could be used in a nuclear war. The idea is similar to how the U.S. shares nuclear weapons with some members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
The U.S. has promised to protect Japan and South Korea against nuclear attack. It also operates major military bases in both countries.
The article on the proposal to deploy9 U.S. nuclear weapons in East Asia was released on July 25. That is the same day North Korea launched two short-range missiles. Early Wednesday, South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff reported that the North launched several missiles from its eastern coast.
The military experts suggest that American nuclear sharing with Japan and South Korea could be based on the NATO model with a few differences.
Currently, the U.S. shares nuclear weapons with Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Turkey. The NATO alliance now has a total of 29 member-states.
The article suggests that a possible nuclear weapons agreement in Japan and South Korea could be based on the agreement with NATO. Both the U.S. and the host country would need to agree to any possible use of the weapons. But some details may need to be changed for the East Asian allies.
Japan and South Korea dispute trade, history
The article suggests that nuclear sharing with Japan and South Korea would improve a “military partnership11 through joint-regional exercises” needed to deter6 North Korea. It also suggests that the move would provide a strong reason for North Korea to continue with negotiations12 to end its nuclear program.
However, arms control expert Gary Samore said the timing13 may not be right for the proposed nuclear sharing because of the current trade dispute between Japan and South Korea.
Trade tensions between the two countries increased after Japan ordered restrictions on products exported to South Korean companies. The parts affected14 are needed in the manufacture of smart phones and high-technology devices.
The dispute has its roots in Koreans’ anger over the Japanese occupation of their country from 1910 to 1945, and its use of Korean forced labor15 during World War II.
South Korea’s Supreme16 Court approved the seizure17 of Japanese-owned property to pay South Koreans who were affected. To answer the export restrictions, many South Koreans are boycotting18 Japanese products. Those boycotts19 have become widespread in Seoul.
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is traveling in Asia this week. Pompeo has said he would like to see Japan and South Korea “find a path forward” from the dispute.
Samore said, “There may come a time when the domestic politics in South Korea and Japan have changed especially when North Korea continues to maintain…nuclear weapons.”
He said, at that point, such an agreement would “make more sense.”
I’m Mario Ritter Jr.
Words in This Story
article –n. a piece of writing about a subject that is in a magazine, newspaper or other publication
capabilities –n. relating to devices or abilities that permit a person to do something
specifically –adv. in a definite, exact way
host –n. a person or country which accepts someone or something into their home or nation
deter –v. to cause someone to decide not to do something
domestic –adj. related to one’s home country
1 joint | |
adj.联合的,共同的;n.关节,接合处;v.连接,贴合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 restrictions | |
约束( restriction的名词复数 ); 管制; 制约因素; 带限制性的条件(或规则) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 deter | |
vt.阻止,使不敢,吓住 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 deterrence | |
威慑,制止; 制止物,制止因素; 挽留的事物; 核威慑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 capabilities | |
n.能力( capability的名词复数 );可能;容量;[复数]潜在能力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 deploy | |
v.(军)散开成战斗队形,布置,展开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 deploying | |
(尤指军事行动)使展开( deploy的现在分词 ); 施展; 部署; 有效地利用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 partnership | |
n.合作关系,伙伴关系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 negotiations | |
协商( negotiation的名词复数 ); 谈判; 完成(难事); 通过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 timing | |
n.时间安排,时间选择 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 labor | |
n.劳动,努力,工作,劳工;分娩;vi.劳动,努力,苦干;vt.详细分析;麻烦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 seizure | |
n.没收;占有;抵押 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 boycotting | |
抵制,拒绝参加( boycott的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 boycotts | |
(对某事物的)抵制( boycott的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|