-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Broadcast: Jan 18 2003
81-year-old Sidney Rittenberg decided1 as a young man he wanted to help build bridges between cultures. He's devoted2 much of his career to promoting business ties between China and the United States, despite the fact that he spent 16 years in a Chinese prison. He now teaches college, where he often lectures on the importance of 2)idealism. "I find myself continually having to encourage students and young entrepreneurs not to be afraid of the future, as long as you're sure that what you're doing is right," he said. "I think some of us in my generation got stamped out as incorrigible3 optimists4, and I think that's something important."
34-year-old Elizabeth Kao is a marketing5 executive at the Ford6 Motor Company. When she looks at people in Sidney Rittenberg's generation, she too is struck by their positive outlook. "I feel like when they were young, they were full of optimism, whereas I think my generation is possibly a little more cynical," she said.
The difference is also reflected in their choice of heroes. Sidney Rittenberg names public figures like American President Franklin Roosevelt. Elizabeth Kao, reared in an era of celebrity7 3)scandals, says her role models are people closer to home, like her parents. It's such distinctions that intrigue8 Robert Thomas and his co-author Warren Bennis. Mister Thomas says they chose the title for their new book, Geeks and Geezers, as an affectionate way to dramatize the difference between leaders in their twenties and early thirties, and those in their 70s and beyond.
The two groups of rebels and 4)innovators launched their careers in different eras, with different goals. "The geeks have grown up in the digital era, have always known computers and the Internet," said Robert Thomas. "The geezers, by contrast, grew up in an era dominated by significant world events, on the order of the Depression and World War II. And when we asked our geezers what was important to them at age 25 to 30, what we heard over and over again was a desire to achieve a measure of stability, particularly coming out of an era of instability. Whereas what our geeks referred to was their desire to shake things up. With all the growth of the Internet and all kinds of business opportunities, it wasn't just a matter of getting a good job and working your way up the corporate9 ladder. It was striking it rich early."
In fact, many young leaders expressed impatience10 with corporate ladders, or other traditional 5)hierarchies respected by their elders. Brian Sullivan was in his mid11 twenties when he founded a venture capital firm called Rolling Oaks Enterprises. "I never was in the military as most of our predecessors12 were, especially in the finance and industrial sectors," he said. "So, yes, there seems to be a bit of rebellion against that structure. But we all recognize there has to be a certain amount of structure for a company to have some consistency13."
And while Elizabeth Kao works at a huge corporation with a complex chain of command, she too wasn't willing to wait years to make her voice heard. "When I hired into Ford, I was part of the manufacturing leadership program, and there was this 6)flurry of new ideas as we took a look around," she said. "So we did quite a bit with the Ford production system."
Nancy Beardsley: "And do you find yourself dealing14 differently with people under you?"
Elizabeth Kao: "My feeling is that the people who work for me are a team. It is not a command-control situation but rather that our team gives each one of us the opportunity to shine."
Robert Thomas says younger leaders who may work at several jobs in just a few years also have a different view of corporate loyalty15. "The late 1940s and 1950s was an era when you found a job and stayed with it, and there was a payoff for you in the course of a lifetime," he said. "Whereas for our geeks there was a very strong sentiment that the employers no longer felt responsible to them, and therefore they no longer felt obligated to employers. That it was their responsibility to manage their individual careers."
Young leaders like Elizabeth Kao also say they want more balance in their lives. "People in my generation are products of the generation before us, people who were willing to work the massive hours," said Elizabeth Kao. "I don't want it to come to the point that I to regret that I didn't have children, or that I didn't spend time with them."
But the book also reveals what the two groups have in common qualities that could be vital for good leadership in any era. Nearly all had some kind of life altering experience that taught them resourcefulness and resilience. For Sidney Rittenberg, it was being isolated16 in a Chinese prison. "You have to learn how to use your mind in such a way that you are thinking positively17 to demonstrate to your captors who you are," he said.
Elizabeth Kao says her turning point was the failure of a dot-com company she started with college friends. "This was a huge learning experience, not only why did things fail, but also what could I do to avoid that situation the next time," she said.
And Robert Thomas says geeks and geezers haven't just learned from past experiences. "The geezers share in common an openness to learning new things," said Robert Thomas. "And we find similar qualities among our geeks. They don't necessarily read the way the geezers did. This is not a reading culture. However, they do a tremendous amount of traveling. They're very interested in new cultural art forms. So in that respect thing they share is an openness to new things."
Robert Thomas says that openness means geeks and geezersfor all their differences can work well together in the same company. And they can learn from each other one group seasoned by war and economic hard times, the other confronting the pioneering possibilities of the Internet age.
I'm Nancy Beardsley.
1) entrepreneur [7CntrEprE5nE:]n. <法>企业家, 主办人
2) idealism [ai5diElizm]n. 理想主义, 唯心论
3) scandal[5skAndl]n. 丑行, 丑闻, 诽谤, 耻辱, 流言蜚语
4) innovator[`InEJveItE(r)]n. 改革者, 革新者
5) hierarchy[5haiErB:ki]n. 特权阶级,层次
6) flurry [5flQri] vi.激动, 慌张
1 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 devoted | |
adj.忠诚的,忠实的,热心的,献身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 incorrigible | |
adj.难以纠正的,屡教不改的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 optimists | |
n.乐观主义者( optimist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 marketing | |
n.行销,在市场的买卖,买东西 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 Ford | |
n.浅滩,水浅可涉处;v.涉水,涉过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 celebrity | |
n.名人,名流;著名,名声,名望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 intrigue | |
vt.激起兴趣,迷住;vi.耍阴谋;n.阴谋,密谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 corporate | |
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 impatience | |
n.不耐烦,急躁 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 mid | |
adj.中央的,中间的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 predecessors | |
n.前任( predecessor的名词复数 );前辈;(被取代的)原有事物;前身 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 consistency | |
n.一贯性,前后一致,稳定性;(液体的)浓度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 dealing | |
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 loyalty | |
n.忠诚,忠心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 isolated | |
adj.与世隔绝的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 positively | |
adv.明确地,断然,坚决地;实在,确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|