-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
White House
04 October 2007
The Bush administration is defending itself against reports that it authorized2 harsher techniques to interrogate3 suspected terrorists than it has previously5 acknowledged. VOA White House Correspondent Scott Stearns has the story.
The New York Times says a February 2005 opinion by the U.S. Justice Department authorized a combination of physical and psychological tactics including head slapping, simulated drowning, and exposure to extreme temperatures.
That previously-undisclosed opinion came three months after a separate, publicized opinion that declared torture abhorrent6.
In a written statement Thursday, the Justice Department said the December 2004 opinion remains7 binding8 and all interrogation practices are fully9 consistent with anti-torture statues.
White House Spokeswoman Dana Perino confirmed the existence of the February 2005 opinion, but she says all procedures used by U.S. interrogators are tough, safe, necessary, and lawful10.
"The policy of the United States is not to torture," Perino said. "The president has not authorized it. He will not authorize1 it. But he has done everything within the corners of the law to make sure that we prevent another attack on this country, which is what we have done in this administration."
Perino says she will not comment specifically as to whether simulated drowning constitutes torture because discussing any specific interrogation techniques would allow the enemy to train against them.
Democratic Senator Ted4 Kennedy says, once again, Americans and people around the world are revolted by what he says is the Bush administration's refusal to reject cruel and degrading treatment of detainees.
"It would be bad enough if this administration had disgraced itself and this country by engaging in cruel and degrading treatment of detainees," Kennedy said. "It's worse still that it enlisted11 the Justice Department in the effort to justify12 and cover-up its activities."
Senator Kennedy says he is sponsoring legislation to apply the standards of the army field manual to all U.S. government interrogations, including the Central Intelligence Agency.
Democrats13 on the House Judiciary Committee say they will investigate the matter. They want the Justice Department to turn over the February 2005 memo14 as well as a separate opinion later that year that found that no CIA interrogation methods violate congressional standards forbidding cruel, inhuman15, or degrading treatment.
The New York Times story again raises the issue of Bush administration interrogation practices as the Senate prepares to begin confirmation16 hearings for Judge Michael Mukasey to replace Alberto Gonzales as attorney general.
1 authorize | |
v.授权,委任;批准,认可 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 authorized | |
a.委任的,许可的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 interrogate | |
vt.讯问,审问,盘问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 ted | |
vt.翻晒,撒,撒开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 previously | |
adv.以前,先前(地) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 abhorrent | |
adj.可恶的,可恨的,讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 binding | |
有约束力的,有效的,应遵守的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 lawful | |
adj.法律许可的,守法的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 enlisted | |
adj.应募入伍的v.(使)入伍, (使)参军( enlist的过去式和过去分词 );获得(帮助或支持) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 justify | |
vt.证明…正当(或有理),为…辩护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 memo | |
n.照会,备忘录;便笺;通知书;规章 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 inhuman | |
adj.残忍的,不人道的,无人性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 confirmation | |
n.证实,确认,批准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|