-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Washington
29 October 2007
In the United States, touch-screen voting machines are more and more becoming the norm. While this new technology enables election officials to quickly tally1 the vote and determine the winners on Election Day, VOA's Jeffrey Young reports that it has also brought new problems that some observers say could erode2 public confidence in the election process.
Florida, November 2000. The White House contest between Republican Party candidate George W. Bush and Democratic Party challenger Al Gore3 was ultimately determined4 by a post-election recount of the state's paper ballot5 cards. In the next presidential election in 2004, many U.S. states decided6 to abandon paper systems and instead use touch-screen computer voting machines. But in embracing this new technology, new vulnerabilities have arisen.
The credibility of a democratically-elected government begins with balloting7 the public believes to be fair and accurately8 counted. And as the technology of voting advances, election officials have to take new steps to ensure accuracy, and with it, credibility.
In Montgomery County, in the mid-Atlantic state of Maryland, as is true across the United States, election workers get special training in setting up and operating electronic voting machines. One instructor9 cites the steps taken to ensure the integrity of what the machines record. "These machines are prepared under 24-hour [security] cameras, and people from both [the Democratic and Republican] parties when they are prepped and set up. Once we open them up [for voting], we are with them [the voting machines] every second until we re-lock them."
On the surface, using touch-screen machines to select candidates and tally the results would appear to be a big step forward. But analyst10 Gary Kalman at the independent U.S. Public Interest Research Group in Washington, D.C. cites a significant shortcoming. "[With] many of these machines, it is very difficult, if not impossible, to actually audit11 the results. So if there is a challenge and a recount, all you can do is look at what the machine says. If the machine was wrong, there is no way to verify or to figure out through any alternative system whether or not the machine is accurate," says Kalman.
These concerns about verifying what an electronic voting machine recorded have prompted some observers, including Benjamin Ginsberg at Johns Hopkins University in Washington, D.C, to call for part of the traditional balloting system to come back. "Look, wherever you have a computer, it is possible to tamper12 with it. And that is why you need to have a paper backup. But I think there have been numerous dry runs [and] numerous studies, and the computer touch screen with paper backup is about as safe as you can get," Ginsberg says.
The paper backup Professor Ginsberg refers to would be a printed receipt of someone's votes that would be saved by election officials and used if there is an election recount. Unfortunately, many of the electronic voting machines now in use do not create receipts. So, states and [smaller subdivisions called] counties would have to purchase many millions of dollars worth of new equipment to have this capability13.
But ultimately, what is at stake is the credibility of the election system in a democratic society.
1 tally | |
n.计数器,记分,一致,测量;vt.计算,记录,使一致;vi.计算,记分,一致 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 erode | |
v.侵蚀,腐蚀,使...减少、减弱或消失 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 gore | |
n.凝血,血污;v.(动物)用角撞伤,用牙刺破;缝以补裆;顶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 ballot | |
n.(不记名)投票,投票总数,投票权;vi.投票 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 balloting | |
v.(使)投票表决( ballot的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 accurately | |
adv.准确地,精确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 instructor | |
n.指导者,教员,教练 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 analyst | |
n.分析家,化验员;心理分析学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 audit | |
v.审计;查帐;核对;旁听 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 tamper | |
v.干预,玩弄,贿赂,窜改,削弱,损害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 capability | |
n.能力;才能;(pl)可发展的能力或特性等 | |
参考例句: |
|
|